Modelling resin production distributions for Pinus pinaster Ait using two probability functions

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 369-377

  Nanos, Nikos ^a   Tadesse, Wubalem ^a   Montero, Gregorio ^a   Gil, Luis ^b   Alia, Ricardo ^a  

^a Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^b Technical University of Madrid   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chaudhry and Ahmad; Modelling; Pinus pinaster; Resin production distribution; Weibull

Indexed keywords

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 0034035845     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2000128     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allué C., Allué M., Notas sobre la marcha ordenada del monte "Pinar Viejo" (Coca, Segovia) I, in: Actas de la reunión de Valsain, SECF, Madrid, 1994, pp. 295-306.
2. Bailey R.L., Dell T.R., Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function, For. Sci. 19 (1973) 97-104.
3. Baldwin V.C.Jr., Peterson K.D., Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L., Dougherty P.M., Equations for estimating Loblolly pine branch and foliage weight and surface area distributions, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 918-927.
4. Bondarev A., Age distribution patterns in open boreal Dahurican larch forests of Central Siberia, For. Ecol. Manage. 93 (1996) 205-214.
5. Chaudhry M.A., Ahmad M., On a probability function useful in size modelling, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1679-1683.
6. De Groot P., Fleming R.A., Analysis and modelling of cohort life tables of Jack pine seed cones, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 1579-1592.
7. Deshmukh D.K., Characterization of Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent) for resin yielding capacities, Indian Forester, June (1966) 368-390.
8. Efron B., Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife, Ann. Statist. 7 (1979) 1-26.
9. Goddard R.A., Peters W.J., Progress in the selection and breeding of superior trees to upgrade gum yield, Naval Stores Rev. 74 (1965) 4-5,13,15.
10. Kershaw J.A., Maguire D.A., Crown structure in western hemlock, Douglas-fir and grand fir in western Washington: horizontal distribution of foliage within branches, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 128-142.
11. Khatouri M., Dennis B., Growth-and-yield model for uneven-aged Cedrus atlantica stands in Morocco, For. Ecol. Manage. 36 (1990) 253-266.
12. Kilkki P., Maltamo M., Mykkänen R., Päivinen R., Use of the Weibull function in estimating the basal area dbh-distribution, Silva Fenn. 23 (1989) 311-318.
13. Maltamo M., Comparing basal area diameter distributions estimated by tree species and for the entire growing stock in a mixed stand, Silva Fenn. 31 (1997) 53-65.
14. Maltamo M., Puumalainen J., Päivinen R., Comparison of beta and Weibull functions for modelling basal area diameter distributions in stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies, Scand. J. For. Res. 10 (1995) 284-295.
15. Mergen F., Inheritance of oleoresin yield in Slash pine, Naval Stores Rev. 64, 9 (1954) 8-20-9.
16. Peters J.W., Variation in oleoresin yielding potential of selected Slash pines, For. Sci. 17 (1971) 306-307.
17. Prada M.A., Allué M., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Programa de mejora genética de Pinus pinaster Ait grandes productores de miera en la provincia de Segovia, in: Actas de la reunión de Madrid, SECF, Madrid, (1996) pp. 67-71.
18. Rennolls K., Geary D.N., Rollinson T.J.D., Characterizing diameter distributions by the use of the Weibull distribution, Forestry 58 (1985) 57-66.
19. Reynolds M.R.Jr., Burk T., Huang W.C., Goodness-of-fit tests and model selection procedures for diameter distribution models, For. Sci. 34 (1988) 373-399.
20. Shiver B.D., Sample sizes and estimation methods for the Weibull distribution for unthinned Slash pine plantation diameter distributions, For. Sci. 34 (1988) 809-814.
21. Squillace A.E., Combining superior growth and timber quality with high gum yield in Slash pine, in: 8th South Conf. Forest Tree Impr. Proc. (1965) pp. 73-76.