|
Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 219-222
|
Comparison in in-vivo response between a bioactive glass and a non-bioactive glass
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIODEGRADATION;
BONE;
GLASS;
MUSCLE;
OPTICAL MICROSCOPY;
SODIUM COMPOUNDS;
BIOACTIVE GLASS;
NONBIOACTIVE GLASS;
IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);
ALUMINUM OXIDE;
CALCIUM OXIDE;
GLASS;
MAGNESIUM OXIDE;
PHOSPHORUS PENTOXIDE;
POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE;
SILICON DIOXIDE;
SODIUM DERIVATIVE;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL MODEL;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
BIODEGRADATION;
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
FEMUR;
HISTOLOGY;
IMPLANT;
IN VIVO STUDY;
INFLAMMATION;
MALE;
MICROSCOPY;
NONHUMAN;
OSSIFICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RABBIT;
RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE;
|
EID: 0034032169
PISSN: 09574530
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008912125171 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (43)
|
References (10)
|