Spatial and temporal ecology of native and introduced fish larvae in lower Putah Creek, California

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 75-87

  Marchetti, Michael P ^a   Moyle, Peter B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drift of larvae; Ecology of larvae; Introduced species; Native species; Phenology; Yolo County

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ICHTHYOFAUNA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LARVA; NATIVE SPECIES; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034029948     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007676228910     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brown, A.V. & M.L. Armstrong. 1985. Propensity to drift down-stream among various species of fish. J. Freshw. Ecol. 3: 3-17.
2. Carter, J.G., V.A. Lamarra & R.J. Ryel. 1986. Drift of larval fishes in the upper Colorado River. J. Freshw. Biol. 3: 567-577.
3. Childs, M.R., R.W. Clarkson & A.T. Robinson. 1998. Resource use by larval and early juvenile native fishes in the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 620-629.
4. Conrow, R., A.V. Zale & R.W. Gregory. 1990. Distribution and abundance of early life stages of fishes in a Florida lake dominated by aquatic macrophytes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 119: 521-528.
5. Copp, C.H. 1997. Microhabitat use of fish larvae and 0+juveniles in a highly regulated section of the River Great Ouse. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 267-276.
6. Dill, W.A. & A. J. Cordone. 1997. History and status of introduced fishes in California, 1871-1996. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bull. 178. 414 pp.
7. Floyd, K.B., R.D. Hoyt & S. Timbrook. 1984. Chronology of appearance and habitat partitioning by stream larval fishes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 217-223.
8. Gadomski, D.M. & C.A. Barfoot. 1998. Diel and distributional abundance patterns of fish embryos and larvae in the lower Columbia and Deschutes rivers. Env. Biol. Fish. 51: 353-368.
9. Harvey, B.C. 1991a. Interaction of abiotic and biotic factors influences larval fish survival in an Oklahoma stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 1476-1480.
10. Harvey, B.C. 1991b. Interactions among streamfishes: predation-induced habitat shifts and larval survival. Oecologia. 87: 29-36.
11. Kissick, L.A. 1993. Comparison of traps lighted by photochemicals or electric bulbs for sampling warm water populations of young fish. North Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 13: 864-867.
12. Marchetti, M.P. 1999a. Ecological effects of non-native fish species in low elevation streams of the Central Valley, California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis. 84 pp.
13. Marchetti, M.P. 1999b. An experimental study of competition between the native Sacramento perch (Archoplites interruptus) and introduced bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Biological Invasions 1: 55-65.
14. Mount, J.F. 1995. California rivers and streams. University of California Press, Berkeley. 359 pp.
15. Moyle, P.B. 2000. Inland fishes of California, 2nd edition. University of California Press. Berkeley (in press).
16. Moyle, P.B. & J.J. Cech, Jr. 1996. Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 590 pp.
17. Moyle, P.B., M.P. Marchetti, J. Baldridge & T.L. Taylor. 1998. Fish health and diversity: justifying instream flows. Fisheries 23(7): 6-15.
18. Moyle, P.B. & M. P. Marchetti. 1998. Applications of Indices of Biotic Integrity to California streams and watersheds, pp. 367-380. In: T.P Simpson (ed.) Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resource Quality Using Fish Assemblages, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
19. Moyle, P.B., J.J. Smith, R.A. Daniels & D.M. Baltz. 1982. A review, pp. 227-256. In: C.H. Hand, G.L. Hunt, P.B. Moyle & J.L. Patton (ed.) Distribution and Ecology of Stream Fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Drainage System, University of California Press, Berkeley.
20. Moyle, P.B. & J.E. Williams. 1990. Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Cons. Biol. 4: 275-284.
21. Mueller, G., M. Horn, J. Kahl, T. Burke & P. Marsh. 1993. Use of larval light traps to capture razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in lake Mohave Arizona-Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 38: 399-402.
22. Peterson, M.S. & S.J. VanderKooy. 1995. Phenology and spatial and temporal distribution of larval fishes in a partially channelized warmwater stream. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 4: 93-105.
23. Robinson, A.T., R.W Clarkson & R.E. Forrest. 1998. Dispersal of larval fishes in a regulated river tributary. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 772-786.
24. Ross, S.T. 1991. Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Env. Biol. Fish. 30: 359-368.
25. Scott, M.T. & L.A. Nielsen. 1989. Young fish distribution in back-waters and main-channel borders of the Kanawha River, West Virginia. J. Fish Biol. 35: (supplement A): 21-27.
26. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. 887 pp.
27. Strange, E.M., P.B. Moyle & T.C. Foin. 1992. Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly. Env. Biol. Fish. 36: 1-15.
28. Strange, E.M. 1995. Pattern and process in stream fish community organization: field study and simulation modeling. PhD. Dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis. 146 pp.
29. Turner, T.F., J.C. Trexler, G.L. Miller & K.E. Toyer. 1994. Temporal and spatial dynamics of larval and juvenile fish abundance in a temperate floodplain river. Copeia 1994: 174-183.
30. Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams, pp. 35-55. In: J.V. Ward & J.A. Stanford (ed.) The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Plenum Press, Boca Raton.
31. Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems, pp. 29-42. In: T.D. Fontaine & S.M. Bartell (ed.) Dynamics of Lotie Ecosystems, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor.
32. Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 159-168.