Sensitivity analysis of EUROSEM using Monte Carlo simulation I: Hydrological, soil and vegetation parameters

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 915-926

  Veihe, A ^a   Quinton, J ^b  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Model uncertainty; Monte Carlo simulation; Sensitivity analysis; Soil erosion modelling

Indexed keywords

CAPILLARITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL MECHANICS; STORMS; VEGETATION;

COHESION; HYDROGRAPHS; SEDIGRAPHS; SOIL EROSION MODEL;

EROSION;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034028708     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000415)14:5<915::AID-HYP978>3.0.CO;2-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beckett PHT, Webster R. 1971. Soil variability: a review. Soils and Fertilisers 34: 1-15.
2. Bhatti AU, Mulla DJ, Frazier BE. 1991. Estimation of soil properties and wheat yields on complex eroded hills using geostatistics and thematic mapper images. Remote Sensing of the Environment 37: 181-191.
3. Chaves HML, Nearing MA. 1991. Uncertainty analysis of the WEPP soil erosion model. Transactions of the ASAE 34(6): 2437-2444.
4. Dempsey M. 1996. The design of buffer strips using EUROSEM. MSc thesis in Environmental Water Management, Silsoe College, Cranfield University.
5. De Roo APJ, Offermans RJE, Cremers NHDT. 1995. LISEM: a single-event, physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II: sensitivity analysis, validation and application. Hydrological Processes 10: 1119-1126.
6. Ferreira VA, Weesies GA, Yoder DC, Foster GR, Renard KG. 1995. The site and condition specific nature of sensitivity analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50: 493-497.
7. Folly A. 1997. Land use planning to minimize soil erosion - a case study from the upper East Region in Ghana. Geographica Hafniensia A6. PhD Thesis, Publications, Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
8. Folly A, Quinton J, Smith R. 1999. Evaluation of the EUROSEM model using data from the Catsop watershed, The Netherlands. CATENA 37(3-4): 507-519.
9. Healy RW, Mills PC. 1991. Variability of an unsaturated sand unit underlying a radioactive waste trench. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55(4): 899-907.
10. Johnston J. 1972. Econometric Methods, (2nd edn). International Student Edition, McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha Ltd: Tokyo.
11. Kazmier LJ. 1976. Theory and Problems of Business Statistics (Schaum's outline series). McGraw-Hill: New York, United States.
12. Lane LJ, Ferreira VA. 1980. Sensitivity analysis. In CREAMS: Chemicals, Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems, Knisel WG (ed.). USDA-ARS Conservation Research Report No. 26: US.
13. Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME. 1998. The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23: 527-544.
14. Nearing MA, Deer-Ascough L, Laflen JM. 1990. Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP hillslope profile erosion model. Transactions of the ASAE 33(3): 839-849.
15. Persicani D. 1995. Evaluation of soil classification and kriging for mapping herbicide leaching simulated by two models. Soil Technology 8: 17-30.
16. Poesen J. 1986. Field measurements of splash erosion to validate a splash transport model. Zeitschrift für Geomorphology N.F. Supplement-Band 58: 81-91.
17. Quinton J. 1994. The validation of physically-based erosion models - with particular reference to EUROSEM. Unpublished PhD thesis, Silsoe College, Cranfield University.
18. Quinton J. 1997. Reducing predictive uncertainty in model simulations: a comparison of two methods using the European soil erosion model (EUROSEM). Catena 30: 101-117.
19. Samper J, Carrera J. 1995. Numerical modelling of remedial actions for a uranium mill tailings in Spain: from model construction to predicting uncertainties. Groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection. Proceedings of the Prague Conference, May 1995. Publication 225, International Association of Hydrological Sciences: Wallingford; 299-310.
20. Smith RE, Herbert RHB. 1979. A Monte Carlo analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability of infiltration. Water Resources Research 15(2): 419-429.
21. Tiscareno-Lopez M, Lopes VL, Stone JJ. Lane LJ. 1993. Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP watershed model for rangeland applications. I: hillslope processes. Transactions of the ASAE 36(6): 1659-1672.
22. Veihe A, Quinton J, Poesen J. 2000. Sensitivity analysis of EUROSEM using Monte Carlo simulation II: the effect of rills and rock fragments. Hydrological Processes 14: 927-939.
23. Vickers AW. 1993. The development of a unique benchmark data base for soil erodibility in England and Wales. Unpublished Mphil thesis, Silsoe College, Cranfield University.
24. Warrick AW, Nielsen DR. 1980. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In Applications of Soil Physics, Hillel D (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 319-344.
25. Woolhiser DA, Smith RE, Goodrich DC. 1990. KINEROS: a kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual. USDA Agricultural Research Service ARS-77: US.