Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of various passive monitors and active monitors for industrial hygiene sampling

American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 64-68

  Nothstein, Greg L ^a   Hahne, Rolf M A ^a   Spence, Mark W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active sampler; Cost effectiveness; Passive sampler

Indexed keywords

AIR MONITORING; AIR SAMPLING; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE;

EID: 0034026556     PISSN: 00028894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1202/0002-8894(2000)061<0064:eotcov>2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Harper, M.: "Validation of Passive Monitors by SKC, Inc." February 1998. [Personal communication]
2. Manning, C.R.: Products and Services to Support Validation of Air Sampling Methods (and accompanying sheets) [Marketing pamphlets]. Palo Alto, CA: Assay Technology, 1997.
3. Berlin, A., R.H. Brown, and K.J. Saunders (eds.): Diffusive Sampling: An Alternative Approach to Workplace Air Monitoring. London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1987.