Transferring insights into commuter behavior dynamics from laboratory experiments to field surveys

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 243-260

  Mahmassani, Hani S ^a   Jou, Rong Chang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Econometric models; Multinomial probit; Route choice; Stated preference; Travel behavior measurement; Trip timing

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

ECONOMETRIC MODELS; MULTINOMIAL PROBIT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR MEASUREMENTS;

TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

COMMUTING; PLANNING METHOD; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0034025308     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00003-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Hatcher, S., 1991. Daily variation of trip chaining, departure time, and route selection of urban commuters. M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
2. Jou R.C., Mahmassani H.S. Comparability and transferability of commuter behavior characteristics between cities: departure time and route switching decisions. Transportation Research Record. 1556:1996;119-130.
3. Jou, R.C., Mahmassani, H.S., 1998. Day-to-day dynamics of urban commuter departure time and route switching decisions: joint model estimation. In: de Dios Ortuzar, J., Hensher, D., Jara-Diaz, S. (Eds.), Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play, Ch. 20. Elsevier Science, Oxford.
4. Jou, R.C., Mahmassani, H.S., Joseph, T., 1992. Daily variability of commuter decisions: Dallas survey results. Research Report 1216-1. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
5. Lam, S.H., 1991. Multinomial probit model estimation: computational procedures and applications. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
6. Mahmassani H.S. Dynamic models of commuter behavior: experimental investigation and application to the analysis of planned traffic disruptions. Transportation Research. 24A:1990;465-484.
7. Mahmassani H.S., Chang G.L., Herman R. Individual decisions and collective effects in a simulated traffic system. Transportation Science. 20:1986;258-271.
8. Mahmassani H.S., Herman R. Interactive experiments for the study of tripmaker behaviour dynamics in congested commuting systems. Jones P. Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, Ch. 13. 1990;Avebury, Aldershot, UK.
9. Simon H. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69:1955;99-118.
10. Stephan, D.G., 1987. Route choice and departure time decision dynamics for urban commuters. M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
11. Tong, C.C., 1990. A study of dynamic a departure time and route choice behavior of urban commuters. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin, TX.