Fragmentation of hydrogel episcleral implants: A series of 4 cases;Fragmentation des indentations en hydrogel. A propos de 4 nouvelles observations

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 174-179

  D'Hermies, F ^a   Korobelnik, J F ^b   Bertin, S ^a   Chauvaud, D ^a   Renard, G ^a   Audouin, J ^a   Diebold, J ^a   Duprez, A ^c  

^a HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^b FONDATION OPHTALMOLOGIQUE ADOLPHE DE ROTHSCHILD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Biocompatible materials; Foreign body reaction; Granuloma; Retinal detachment; Scleral buckling

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; IMPLANT; MALE; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETINAL DETACHMENT; SCLERA; SCLERAL BUCKLING;

EID: 0034023258     PISSN: 01815512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Schepens CL. Scleral buckling with circling element. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol, 1964;68:959-79.
2. Michels RG. Scleral buckling methods for rhegmatogenous detachment. Retina, 1986;6:1-49.
3. William GA, Aaberg TM. Techniques of scleral buckling. In: Ryan S.J. (ed) Retina: CV Mosby, Saint Louis, 1989;pp.111-149.
4. Boniuk M, Zimmerman L.E. Necrosis of the uvea sclera and retina following operations for retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol, 1961;66:318-26.
5. Boniuk M, Zimmerman L.E. Necrosis of the iris, ciliary body, lens and retina following scleral buckling operations with circling polyethylene tubes. Trans Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol, 1961;65:671-93.
6. Boniuk M., Zimmerman LE. Pathological anatomy of complications, Schepens CL, Regan CDJ (ed) Controversial aspects of the management of retinal detachment, Little Brown, Boston, 1965; pp.263-311.
7. Kornblueth W, Behr A, Zauberman C. Histopathological findings following scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol, 1964; 57: 261-4.
8. Witschel H, Faulhorn J. Gewebereaktionen auf Plomben - und Cerclage - material: Polyamid-Silikon-Polyester. Graefes Arch klin exp Ophthalmol, 1978;206:217-226.
9. Apple DJ, Naumann GOH. Retina, Naumann GOH, Apple DJ (eds), Pathology of the eye, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986;pp.577-696.
10. Green WR. Retina, Spencer WH (ed) Ophthalmic pathology, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1996;pp.667-1331.
11. Wilson DJ, Green WR. Histopathologic study of the effect of retinal detachment surgery on 49 eyes obtained post mortem. Am J Ophthalmol, 1987;103:167-79.
12. Lucas DR. The Retina. In: Lucas DR (ed) Greer's ocular pathology, Blackwell, Oxford, 1989;pp.148-94.
13. Von Domarus D, Naumann GOH. Accidental and surgical trauma and wound healing of the eye, Naumann GOH, Apple DJ (eds), Pathology of the eye, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986;pp. 185-248.
14. Yanoff M, Fine BS. Retina, Yanoff M, Fine BS (ed) Ocular pathology, JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1989;377-465.
15. Barr CC. The histopathology of successful retinal detachment. Retina, 1990;10:189-94.
16. Vistnes LM, Ksander GA, Kosek J. Study of encapsulation of silicone rubber implants in animals. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1978;62:580-8.
17. Refojo MF, Leong FL, Chan IM, Tolentino FI. Absorption and release of antibiotics by a hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling. Retina, 1983;3:45-9.
18. Refojo MF, Leong FL. Poly(methyl-acrylate-co-hydroxyethyl-acrylate) hydrogel implant material of strength and softness. J Biomed Mater Res, 1981;15:497-508.
19. Refojo MF, Natchiar G, Liu HS, Lahav M, Tolentino FI. New hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling. Ann Ophthalmol, 1980;12:88-92.
20. Tolentino FI, Refojo MF, Schepens CL. A hydrophilic acrylate implant for scleral buckling. Technique and clinical experience. Retina, 1981;1:281-6.
21. Tolentino FI, Lahav M, Refojo MF, Liu LHS, Chan IM. Hydrophilic acrylate scleral implants in rabbits. Long-term clinicopathologic observations. Retina, 1983;3:50-8.
22. Ho PC, Chan IM, Refojo MF, Tolentino FI. The MAI hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling: A review. Ophthalmic Surg, 1984;15: 511-5.
23. Tolentino FI, Roldan M, Nassif J, Refojo MF. Hydrogel implants for scleral buckling. Long term observations. Retina, 1985;5:38-41.
24. Marin JF, Tolentino FI, Refojo MF, Schepens CL. Long term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant. Arch Ophthalmol, 1992;110:86-8.
25. D'Hermies F, Korobelnik JF, Savoldelli M, Chauvaud D, Pouliquen Y. Miragel versus Silastic used as episcleral implants in rabbits. An experimental and histologic comparative study. Retina, 1995;15: 62-7.
26. D'Hermies F, Korobelnik JF, Caputo G, Mashhour B, Chauvaud D, Pouliquen Y, Renard G. Encapsulation of scleral buckling materials. A study of 60 specimens. Ophthalmology, 1998;105:1079-86.
27. KI Hwang, Lim JI. Hydrogel exoplant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery. Arch. Ophthalmol, 1997;115:1205-6.
28. Roldan-Pallares M , Del Castillo Sanz JL, Awad-El Susi S, Refojo MF. Long-term complications of silicone and hydrogel explants in retinal reattachment surgery. Arch Opththalmol, 1999;117:197-201.
29. Williams DF. The response of the body environment to implants, Williams DF, Roaf R (eds), Implants in surgery, WB Saunders, London, 1973;pp.203-97.
30. Coleman DL, King RN, Andrade JD. The foreign body reaction: A chronic inflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res, 1974;8:199-211.
31. Ziats NP, Miller KM, Anderson JM. In vitro and in vivo interactions of cells with biomaterials. Biomaterials, 1988;9:5-13.