The whaling issue

Marine Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 179-191

  Aron, William ^a   Burke, William ^a   Freeman, Milton M R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conservation; ICRW; IWC; RMP; Sustainable use; Whale population status; Whaling

Indexed keywords

MARINE POLICY; NATURE CONSERVATION; WHALING;

CETACEA;

EID: 0034019582     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-597X(99)00031-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Scarff J.E. The international management of whales, dolphins and porpoises: an interdisciplinary assessment. Ecology L.Q. 6(2-3):1977;323-638.
2. Schevill WE, (editor). The Whale Problem: a status report, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1974.
3. Tonnessen J.N, Johnson A.O. The history of modern whaling. 1982;Univ. of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
4. Spencer L, Bollwerk J, Morais RC. The not so peaceful world of Greenpeace. Forbes Magazine, November 11 1991:174-80.
5. Butterworth D. The Revised Management Procedure - The Core of the Revised Management Scheme. In: Young, Nina M et al., editors, 1993. Understanding the Revised Management Procedure 17-43 Washington, DC: Center for Marine Conservation, 1993.
6. See Friedheim R. Moderation in the pursuit of justice: explaining Japan's failure in the international whaling negotiations, 27 Ocean Dev. and Int'l L. 1996;349:359-61.
7. Kalland A. The anti-whaling campaigns and Japanese responses. In: Japanese position on whaling and anti-whaling campaigns 11-26. Tokyo: The Institute of Cetacean Research, 1998.
8. Birnie P. International Regulation of Whaling 1985;116-30.
9. Birnie P. UNCED and marine mammals. 17 Marine Policy. 501:1993;509-512.
10. Burke W. UNCED and the oceans. 17 Marine Policy. 519:1993;526-527.
11. Klinowska M. How Brainy are Cetaceans?, 32 Oceanus 1993, 14-20.
12. Misaki S. Japanese world view on whales and whaling. In: Whaling issues and Japan's whale research. Tokyo: The Institute of Cetacean Research, 1993.
13. Report to Technical Committee Working Group on the Socio-economic Implications of a Zero-catch Limit, from the International Study Group of Norwegian Small-type Whaling, Norwegian Small-Type Whaling in Cultural Perspective, IWC/44/SEST1, p. 71 (1992) (Report available from IWC).
14. Palsson G. Modes of production and minke whaling: simple commodity production in Icelandic fishing. In: Report of the Symposium on the Utilization of Marine Living Resources for Subsistence, Vol. 1, Institute of Cetacean Research, Tokyo: 1992, 77-78.
15. Manderson L, Hardacre H. Small-type coastal whaling in Ayukawa: Draft Report of Research, December 1998-January 1999. p. 21, IWC/41/SE3; Government of Japan, Socio-economic impact of countermeasures in the four Japanese STCW communities, TC/42/SEST2, available from the International Whaling Commission. See also, Chairman's Report, 41st IWC meeting in 40 IWC Report, 1990. p. 12.
16. Manderson L, Hardacre H. Small-type coastal whaling in Ayukawa: Draft Report of Research, December 1998-January 1999. p. 21, IWC/41/SE3; Government of Japan, Socio-economic impact of countermeasures in the four Japanese STCW communities, TC/42/SEST2, available from the International Whaling Commission. See also, Chairman's Report, 41st IWC meeting in 40 IWC Report, 1990. p. 12.
17. Bestor TC. Socio-economic implications of a zero catch limit on distribution channels and related activities in Hokkaido and Miyagi Prefectures, IWC/41/SE1, available from the International Whaling Commission.
18. Misaki S. Responsible management of renewable resources: case for whaling. In: Whaling for the 21st Century, Tokyo: The Institute of Cetacean Research. 1996. p. 21-22.
19. Monthly Monitor, Public Relations Office, Prime Minister's Chamber, Government of Japan, October 1995. pp. 1-51.
20. Thjodarpuls GALLUP. Issue 10, October 1998; republished in Morgunbladid, October 15, 1998.
21. Freeman MMR, Kellert SR. International attitudes to whales, whaling, and use of whale products: a six-country survey. In Freeman MMR, Kreuter UP editors. Elephants and whales: resources for whom?. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers 1994, Basel, Switzerland, p. 12.
22. Responsive Management. Knowledge of whales and whaling and opinions of minke harvest among residents of Australia, France, the United Kindgom and the United States. Harrisburg, VA: Responsive Management, 1998. p. 20.
23. Responsive Management. American's opinions of minke whale harvest. Report prepared for Henke and Associates. Harrisburg, VA: Responsive Management, 1997. p. 12.
24. Kalland A. Whose whale is that?, Diverting the commodity path, 5 Maritime Anthropological Studies, No. 2, 1992. pp. 16-45.