Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 321-333

  Starritt, Hazel C ^a   Hoad, Caroline L ^b   Duck, Francis A ^a   Nassiri, Dariush K ^c   Summers, Ian R ^b   Vennart, William ^b  

^a Bath Inst of Medical Engineering   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acoustic streaming; Magnetic Resonance; Tissue characterisation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; BODY FLUIDS; DIAGNOSIS; TISSUE; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

CYSTIC LESIONS; DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND SCANNERS; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FLOW RATE; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TRANSDUCER; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 0034018485     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00127-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bacon D.R. Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 10:1984;189-194.
2. Betheras F.R. Acoustic radiation force as a diagnostic modality. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. 1990;69 ASUM, Adelaide, Austalia.
3. Caprihan A., Fukushima E. Flow measurements by NMR. Phys Rep. 198:1990;192-235.
4. Caprihan A., Altobelli S.A., Benitez-Read E. Flow-velocity imaging from linear regression of phase images with techniques for reducing eddy-current effects. J Magn Res. 90:1990;71-89.
5. Caprihan A., Griffey R.H., Fukushima E. Velocity imaging of slow coherent flows using stimulated echoes. Magn Res Med. 15:1990;327-333.
6. Damion R.A., Vennart W., Summers I.R., Ellis R.E. Water diffusion coefficient measurements in the finger by magnetic resonance imaging. MRI. 12:1994;873-879.
7. Duck F.A. Acoustic streaming and radiation pressure in diagnostic applications what are the implications? Barnett S.B., Kossoff G. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Progress in obstetrics and gynaecology series. 1998;87-98 Parthenon, New York.
8. Duck F.A., Henderson J. Acoustic output of modern ultrasound Equipment is it increasing? Barnett S.B., Kossoff G. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Progress in obstetrics and gynaecology series. 1998;15-25 Parthenon, New York.
9. Duck F.A., Starritt H.C. Acoustic shock generation by ultrasound imaging equipment. Br J Radiol. 57:1984;231-240.
10. Duck FA, MacGregor SA, Greenwell D. Measurement of streaming velocities in medical ultrasonic beams using laser anemometry. In: Hobaek H, ed. Advances in non-linear acoustics. Singapore: World Scientific 1993:607-612.
11. Eckart C. Vortices and streams caused by sound waves. Phys Rev. 73:1948;68-76.
12. Fox F.E., Hertzfeld K.F. On the forces producing the ultrasound wind. Phys Rev. 78:1950;156-157.
13. Hartley C.J. Characteristics of acoustic streaming created and measured by pulsed Doppler ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr. 44:1997;1278-1285.
14. Hayward R.J., Packer K.J., Tomlinson D.J. Pulsed field gradient spin echo NMR studies of flow in fluids. Molec Phys. 23:1972;1083-1102.
15. Holz M., Müller C., Wachter A.M. Modification of the pulsed magnetic field gradient method for the determination of low velocities by NMR. J Magn Res. 69:1986;108-115.
16. Kamakura T., Matsuda K., Kumamoto Y., Breazeale M.A. Acoustic streaming induced in focused Gaussian beams. J Acoust Soc Am. 97:1995;2740-2746.
17. Kose K. NMR Imaging of turbulent structure in a transectional pipe flow. J Phys D Appl Phys. 23:1990;981-983.
18. Lighthill J. Acoustic streaming. J Sound Vibration. 61:(3):1978;391-418.
19. Meissner A. 1926, Uber piezo-elektrische Kristalle bei hochfrequenz. Zeitschr Techn Physik. 12:1926;585-594.
20. Mitome H, Ishikawa A, Takeda H, Kyoma K. Effects of attenuation of ultrasound as a source of driving force of acoustic streaming. In: Hobaek, ed. Advances in non-linear acoustics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1993:589-594.
21. Mitome H., Kozuka T., Tuziuti T. Measurement of the establishment process of acoustic streaming using laser Doppler velocimetry. Ultrasonics. 34:1996;527-530.
22. Moran P.R. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging. 1:1982;197-203.
23. Nightingale K.R., Kornguth P.J., Walker W.F., McDermott B.A., Trahey G.E. A novel ultrasonic technique for differentiating cysts from solid lesions preliminary results in the breast . Ultrasound Med Biol. 21:1995;745-751.
24. Nightingale K.R. The use of acoustic streaming in breast lesion diagnosis A clinical study . Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;75-87.
25. Nowicki A., Secomski W., Wojcik J. Acoustic streaming comparison of low-amplitude linear model with streaming velocities measured by 32-MHz Doppler . Ultrasound Med Biol. 23:1997;783-791.
26. Nyborg W.L. Acoustic streaming due to attenuated plane waves. J Acoust Soc Am. 25:1953;68-75.
27. Nyborg W.L. Acoustic streaming. Mason W.P. Physical acoustics. Vol. 2, Part B:1965;265 Academic Press, New York.
28. Nyborg W.L. Acoustic streaming. Hamilton M.F., Blackstock D.T. Nonlinear acoustics. 1998;207-228 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
29. Perkins M.A. A versatile force balance for ultrasound power measurement. Phys Med Biol. 34:1989;1645-1652.
30. Preston R.C. The NPL ultrasound beam calibrator. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr. 35:1988;122-139.
31. Semenova N.G. Effect of turbulence on the magnitude of the acoustic streaming velocity. Soviet Phys Acoust. 16:1971;537-539.
32. Singer J.R. NMR diffusion and flow measurements and an introduction to spin phase graphing. J Phys E. 11:1978;281-291.
33. Starritt H.C., Duck F.A., Humphrey V.F. An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound fields. Ultrasound Med Biol. 15:1989;363-373.
34. Starritt H.C., Duck F.A., Humphrey V.F. Forces acting in the direction of propagation in pulsed ultrasound fields. Phys Med Biol. 36:1991;1465-1474.
35. Stejskal O.E. Use of spin echoes in a pulsed magnetic-field gradient to study anisotropic restricted diffusion flow. J Chem Phys. 43:1965;3597-3603.
36. Tjötta S. On some non-linear effects in sound fields with special emphasis on the generation of vorticity and the formation of streaming patterns. Arch Math Naturvidensk. 55:1959;1-68.
37. Wu J., Du G. Acoustic streaming generated by focused Gaussian and finite amplitude tonebursts. Ultrasound Med Biol. 19:1993;167-176.
38. Zauhar G., Starritt H.C., Duck F.A. Studies of acoustic streaming in biological fluids with an ultrasound Doppler. Br J Radiol. 71:1998;297-302.