The character of the cerebrospinal fluid production

Neuroscience Research Communications

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 69-76

  Oreskovic D ^a,b   Klarica, M ^b   Lupret, V ^c   Vukic M ^c  

^a RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^c SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Croatia)

Author keywords

CSF production; Intracranial pressure; Ventriculocisternal perfusion

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CALCULATION; CAT; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

EID: 0034018049     PISSN: 08936609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6769(200003/04)26:2<69::AID-NRC1>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davson H, Welch K, Segal M B. Physiology and pathology of the cerebrospinal fluid 1987; Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
2. Pollay M, Stevens A, Roberts P A. Alteration in choroid plexus blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid formation by increased ventricular pressure. In: Wood J H (ed). Neurobiology of cerebrospinal fluid 2 1983; Plenum Press, New York, 687-695.
3. Orešković D, Whitton P S, Lupret V. Effect of intracranial pressure on cerebrospinal fluid formation in isolated brain ventricles. Neurosci 1991; 41: 773-777.
4. Heisey S R, Held D, Pappenheimer J. R. Bulk flow and diffusion of the cerebrospinal fluid system of the goat. Am J Physiol 1962; 203: 775-781.
5. Orešković D. Effect of the hydrostatic pressure on cerebrospinal fluid formation and absorption. Ph D thesis 1987; University of Zagreb.
6. Hochwald M C, Sahar A. Effect of spinal fluid pressure on cerebrospinal fluid formation. Exp Neurol 1971; 32: 30-40.
7. Orešković D, Bulat M. Hydrostatic force in regulation of CSF volume. In: Avezaat C J J, Eijndhoven J H M, Maas A I R, Tans J T J (eds). Intracranial pressure VIII 1993; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 731-734.
8. Weiss M H, Wertman N. Modulation of CSF production by alterations in cerebral perfusion pressure. Arch Neurol 1978; 32: 527-529.
9. Artru A A. Dose-related changes in the rate of cerebrospinal fluid following administration of thiopental, midazolam and etomidate in dogs. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 541-546.
10. Rubin R C, Henderson E S, Ommaya A K, et al. The production of cerebrospinal fluid in man and its modification by acetazolamide. J Neurosurg 1966; 25: 430-436.
11. Martins A N, Newby N, Doyle T F. Sources of error in measuring cerebrospinal fluid formation by ventriculo-cisternal perfusion. J Neurol Neurosurg 1977; 40: 645-650.
12. Pollay M. Review of spinal fluid physiology: production and absorption in relation to pressure. Clin Neurosurg 1977; 24: 254-269.
13. Bulat M. Dynamics and statics of the cerebrospinal fluid: the classical and new hypotheses. In: Avezaat C J J, Eijndhoven J H M, Maas A I R, Tans J T J (eds). Intracranial pressure VIII 1993; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 726-730.
14. Klarica M, Gmajnički B, Orešković D, et al. Osmotic force of the CSF and intracranial pressure in health and disease. In: Avezaat C J J, Eijndhoven J H M, Maas A I R, Tans J T J (eds). Intracranial pressure VIII 1993; Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 735-737.
15. Klarica M, Orešković D, Kalousek M, et al. Intracranial pressure response to application of hyperosmolal sucrose into cerebrospinal fluid by the microvolume exchange method in dogs. Neurol Croat 1994; 43: 147-154.