Limitations of model predictive controllers

Hydrocarbon Processing

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 83-88

  Hugo, A ^a  

^a Control Arts ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034017568     PISSN: 00188190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Marlin, T.E., Process Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
2. Harris, T., and L. Desborough, "Performance Assessment Measures for Univariate Feedback Control," Cdn J. of Chem. Eng, 70, pp. 1186-1197, 1992.
3. Huang, B., S. L. Shah, and E. K., Kwok, "Good, Bad or Optimal? Performance Assessment of Multivariable Processes," Automatica, 33, No 6, pp. 1175-1183, 1197.
4. AspenWatch Brochure, Aspen Tech, 1998.
5. Box, E.P., W. G. Hunter and J. S. Hunter, Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley & Sons, 1978, pp 487-498.
6. Ricker, L., "Decentralized Control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process," J. Proc. Control, 6, pp. 205-221, 1996.
7. Luyben, W. L., B. D. Tyreus and M. L. Luyben, Plantwide Process Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
8. Lundstrom, P., J. H. Lee, M. Morari and S. Skogestad, "Limitations of Dynamic Matrix Control," Comp. & Chem. Eng., 19, 4, 1995.
9. Qin, S. J. and T. A. Badgwell, "An Overview of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology," CPC-V, 1996
10. Forbes, J. F., and T E. Marlin, I&EC Research, 33, pp 1919-1929, 1994.
11. Nimmo, I., "Abnormal situation management: giving your control system ability to 'cope'," The Journal for Industrial Automation and Control, Honeywell, July 1995.
12. MacGregor, J.F. and B. S. Dayal, "Identification of Finite Impulse Response Models: Methods and Robustness Issues," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35, pp 4078-4090, 1996.