In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions

Ecological Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 185-192

  Neumayer, Eric ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allocation rules; Emission rights; Global warming; Historical accountability; Kyoto protocol

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GREENHOUSE GAS;

EID: 0034017359     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Agarwal, A., Narain, S., 1991. Global Warming in an Unequal World. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi.
2. Arrhenius S. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature on the ground. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. S15. 41:1896;237-276.
3. Barrett, S., 1992. 'Acceptable' allocations of tradeable carbon emission entitlements in a global warming treaty. In: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Ed.), Combating Global Warming-Study on a Global System of Tradeable Carbon Emissions Entitlements. United Nations, New York, pp. 85-113.
4. Beckerman W., Pasek J. The equitable international allocation of tradable carbon emission permits. Global Environ. Change. 5:1995;405-413.
5. Bos E., Vu M.T., Massiah E., Bulatao R.A. World Population Projections, 1994-95 edn. 1994;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
6. Ghosh P. Structuring the equity issue in climate change. Achanta A.N. The Climate Change Agenda - An Indian Perspective. 1993;267-274 Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.
7. Grubb M. Seeking fair weather: ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int. Affairs. 71:1995;463-496.
8. Grubb M., Sebenius J., Magalhaes A., Subak S. Sharing the Burden. Mintzer I.M. Confronting Climate Change: Risks, Implications and Responses. 1992;305-322 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Grübler A., Fujii Y. Inter-generational and spatial equity issues of carbon accounts. Energy. 16:1991;1397-1416.
10. Hyder T.O. Climate negotiations: the north/south perspective. Mintzer I.M. Confronting Climate Change: Risks, Implications and Responses. 1992;323-336 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. IPCC, 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change - Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. 2-emissions by using equity rules and optimization. RIVM, Report no. 222901012. Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.
13. Molitor, M.R. (Ed.), 1991. International Environmental Law - Primary Materials. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer.
14. Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. 1974;Blackwell, Oxford.
15. OECD, 1974. Recommendation on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle, C(74)223. OECD, Paris.
16. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., Wise M. International inequality and differentiation in global warming policy. Environ. Resource Econ. 12:1998;25-51.
17. Smith K. Allocating responsibility for global warming: the natural debt index. Ambio. 20:1991;95-96.
18. Smith K. The basics of greenhouse gas indices. Hayes P., Smith K. The Global Greenhouse Regime: Who Pays? 1995;20-50 Earthscan, London.
19. United Nations, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, online available at www.unfccc.de.
20. United Nations, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, online available at www.unfccc.de.
21. Young H.P., Wolf A. Global warming negotiations: does fairness matter? Brookings Rev. 10:1991;46-51.