The postmortem fate of Pat Gregory: A disinterred Native American

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 488-494

  Murad, Turhon A ^a   Murad, Todd D ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cranial analysis; Forensic anthropology; Forensic science; Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); Physical anthropology; Positive identification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; HUMAN; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL;

EID: 0034016491     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14713j     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Buikstra JE, Gordon CC. The study and restudy of human skeletal series: The importance of long-term curation. In: Cantwell A, Griffin JB, Rothchild NA, editors. The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collection. Ann NY Acad Sci 1981;376:449-65.
2. Buikstra JE. Reburial: How we all lose, an archaeologist's opinion. Counc Mus Anthropol Newslett 1983;7:2-5.
3. Ubelaker DH, Grant LG. Human skeletal remains: Preservation or reburial? Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 1989;32:249-87.
4. Murad TA. What the bones can't teach us . . . If they are reburied. Chico News and Review 1990 April 26:A4.
5. Murad TA. The scientific value of Indian remains. San Francisco Chronicle 1990 July 7;A14.
6. Lorenz JG, Smith DC. Distribution of four founding mtDNA haplogroups among Native North Americans. AJPA 1996;101:307-23.
7. Barrow M, Niswander J, Fortuine R. Health and disease of American Indians North of Mexico. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. 1972.
8. Gregg JB, Zimmerman LJ, Clifford S, Gregg PS. Craniofacial anomalies in the upper Missouri River basin over a millennium: Archaeological and clinical evidence. Cleft Palate J 1981;18:210-22.
9. Binford LR. Mortuary practices: Their study and their potential. In: Brown JA, editor. Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. Am Antiquity, (part 2) 1971;36:6-29.
10. Blakely RL, editor. Biocultural adaptation in prehistoric America. Athens: University of Georgia Press. 1977.
11. Larsen CS, Kelly RL. Bioarchaeology of the Stillwater Marsh. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, No. 77 1995.
12. Murad TA. The positive identification of a disinterred Native American cranium. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 1996;2:164.
13. Murad TA. Forensic anthropology's service to modern Native Americans. Paper presented at the Anthropology Forum, CSU, Chico. Feb 8, 1996.
14. Ubelaker DH. Positive identification of American Indian skeletal remains from radiograph comparison. J Forensic Sci 1990;35(2):466-72.
15. American Board of Forensic Anthropology, Inc. ABFA Web Page. http//www.csuchico.edu/anth/ABFA.
16. Gosting KA. Indian Sierra trek saddened by opened grave. San Francisco Examiner 1990 June 11;C8.
17. Gosting KA. Indian gravesite vandalized. San Francisco Examiner 1990 June 12;C8.
18. Grave-robbing suspect nabbed in June Lake, [editorial] Review Herald. Mammoth Lakes, 1990 June 21;A1 & 7.
19. Shannon JC, Hess G. Joining forces to combat burial vandalism: A case history. Paper presented at the Conference of the Society for American Archaeology. New Orleans, LA. 1991.
20. Giles E, Elliot O. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Physical Anthropolog 1963;21:53-8.
21. Ousley SD, Jantz RL. FORDISC 2.0: Personal computer forensic discriminant functions. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, 1997.
22. Meindel RS, Lovejoy CO. Ectocranial sutures closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral anterior sutures. Am J Physical Anthropolog 1985;68:57-66.
23. Giles E, Elliot O. Race identification from cranial measurements. J Forensic Sci 1962;7(2):147-57.
24. Birkby WH. An evaluation of race and sex identification from cranial measurement. Am J Physical Anthropolog 1966;24:21-8.
25. Ousley SD, Jantz RL. FORDISC 1.0: Personal computer forensic discriminant functions. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, 1993.
26. Kerley ER. Special observations on skeletal identification. J Forensic Sci 1962;17:349-57.
27. Glister J, Brash JC. Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton case. Edinburugh: E and S. Livingston, 1937.
28. Buikstra JE, Gordon CC, St Hoyme L. The case of the severed skull: Individuation in forensic anthropology. In: Rathbun TA, Buikstra JE, editors. Human identification: Case studies in forensic anthropology. Springfield: CC Thomas, 1984.