Cost analysis between stent and conventional balloon angioplasty

Japanese Circulation Journal

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 161-164

  Kobayashi, Yoshio ^a,b   De Gregorio, Joseph ^a   Yamamoto, Yutaka ^b   Komiyama, Nobuyuki ^b   Miyazaki, Akira ^b   Masuda, Yoshiaki ^b  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Coronary artery disease; Cost; Stent

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; JAPAN; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; REVASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CORONARY DISEASE; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STENTS;

EID: 0034011187     PISSN: 00471828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/jcj.64.161     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fischman D, Leon MB, Bai DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, et al: A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501
2. Serruys P, Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, et al: A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-495
3. Cohen DJ, Krumholz HM, Sukin CA, Ho KKL, Siegrist RB, Cleman M, et al: In-hospital and one-year economic outcomes after coronary stenting or balloon angioplasty: result from a randomized clinical trial. Circulation 1995; 92: 2480-2487
4. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, Kuntz RE, Goldman L, Baim DS, et al: Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of stenting as a treatment for symptomatic single-vessel coronary disease: use of a decision-analytic model. Circulation 1994; 89: 1859-1874
5. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, Weintraub RM, Kuntz RE, Weinstein MC, et al: Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1052-1059
6. Sukin CA, Baim DS, Caputo RP, Ho KKL. Laham RL, Flatley MG, et al: The impact of optimal stenting techniques on cardiac catheterization laboratory resource utilization and costs. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 275-280
7. Dick RJ, Popma JJ, Muller DMW, Burek KA, Topol EJ: In-hospital costs associated with new percutaneous coronary devices. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 879-885
8. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, et al: Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995; 91: 1676-1688
9. Weinstein MC, Stason WB: Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1982; 66(Suppl III): 56-66
10. Goldman L, Sia STB, Cook EF, Rutherford JD, Weinstein MC: Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long-term beta-adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 152-157
11. Krumholz HM, Pasternak RC, Weinstein MC, Friesinger GC, Ridker PM, Tosteson ANA, et al: Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 7-13
12. Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V, Santaera O, Marchand E, Pardinas C, et al: Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting vs. primary stent (OCBAS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1351-1357
13. Narins CR, Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ: A call for provisional stenting: the balloon is back! Circulation 1998; 97: 1298-1305
14. Finkler SA: The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 102-109