Estates of mind: Culture’s many paths to land

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-60

  Geisler, Charles C ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034011108     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089419200279234     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agar, H. 1938. Pursuit of happiness. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Babcock, R. F., and D. A. Feuer. 1977. Land as a commodity affected with the public interest. Washington Law Review 52:289-334.
3. Barlowe, R. 1965. Federal programs for the direction of land use. Iowa Law Review 50:337-367.
4. Berry, W. 1986. The unsettling of America. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
5. Brecht, G. 1983. Estates of mind: A perspective on property. NEW month June:13-14.
6. Bromley, D. 1984. Public and private interests in the federal lands: Toward conciliation. In Public land and the U.S. Economy, eds. G. M. Johnston and P. M. Emerson, pp. 3-18. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7. Chase, A. 1987. How to save our national parks. Atlantic 260:35-44.
8. Clawson, M. 1963. Public and private interest in public land. In Land use polity and problems in the United States, ed. H. W. Ottoson, pp. 350-375. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9. Cohn, J. P. 1988. Culture and conservation. Bio Science 38(7):450-453.
10. Conzen, K. N. 1985. Peasant pioneers: Generational succession among German farmers in frontier Minnesota, In The countryside in the age of capitalist transformation: Essays in social history of rural America, eds. S. Hayn and J. Produe, pp. 259-292. Chapel Hill: University ofNorth Carolina Press.
11. Cribbet, J. E. 1978. Property in the twenty-first century. Ohio State Law Journal 39:671-678.
12. Cribbet, J. E. 1986. Concepts in transition: The search for a new definition of property. University of Illinois Law Review 1:1-40.
13. Dana, S. T., and S. K. Fairfax. 1980. Forest and range policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Daugherty, A. B. 1991. Major Uses of Land in the United States: 1987. Agricultural Economic Report 535. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS.
15. Geisler, C. C., and B. L. Bedford. 1997. Ecosystem management: Who’s entitled? Social conflict over property rights, ed. H. Jacobs, pp. 131-158. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16. Geisler, C. C., and H. Mitsuda. 1987. Mobile-home growth, regulation, and discrimination in upstate New York. Rural Sociology 52:532-543.
17. Hardin, G. 1986. Cultural carrying capacity: A biological approach to human problems. Bio Science 36:599-606.
18. Jackson, R. H., and L. Hudman. 1990. Cultural geography: People, places and environment. Minneapolis, MN: West.
19. Locke, J. 1960. Second treatise on civil government. Cambridge: Peter Laslett. 1689.
20. McDonnell, J. A. 1991. The dispossession of the American Indian. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
21. Nash, R. 1975. Qualitative landscape values: The historical perspective. In Landscape assessment, eds. E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, and J. G. Fabos, pp. 10-17. New York: Halsted Press.
22. National Research Council. 1993. Setting priorities for land conservation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Nelson, R. H. 1984. Private rights to government actions: How modern property rights evolve. University of Illinois Law Review 1986(2):361-386.
24. Philbrick, F. S. 1938. Changing conceptions of property in law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 86:691-732.
25. Reich, C. 1964. The new property, Yale Law Journal 73(April):733-787.
26. Reps, J. 1964. Requiem for zoning. Planning 7:56-65.
27. Robbins, R. M. 1942. Our landed heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Rose, C. M. 1994. Property and persuasion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29. Rudzitis, G., and H. E. Johansen. 1989. Amenities, Migration, and Non-Metropolitan Development. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC.
30. Sakolski, A. 1957. Land reform in America. New York: R. Salkenbach Foundation.
31. Salamon, S. 1984. Ethnic origin as explanation for local ownership patterns. In Research in rural sociology and development, ed. H. K. Schwarzweller, Vol. 1, pp. 161-186. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Salamon, S. 1995. Territory contested through property in a midwestern post-agricultural community. Who Owns America? Conference, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 21-24 June.
33. Sauer, C. O. 1925. Morphology of landscapes. University of California Publications in Geography 2:19-54.
34. Sharp, G. W., C. W. Hendee, and W. E. Sharp. 1986. Introduction to forestry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Southwest Environmental Center. 1992. A Report on the County Movement. Las Cruces, NM: Southwest Environmental Center, September.
36. Stoddard, R. H., B. W. Blouet, and D. J. Wishart. 1986. Human geography. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Turner, F. J. 1893. The frontier in American history. Report of the American Historical Association for 1893, pp. 199-227.
38. Wagoner, P. L. 1998. The unsettled frontier: Property, blood and U. S. federal policy. In Property relations, ed. C. M. Hann, pp. 124-141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Webb, W. P. 1951. Ended: 400 Year boom, reflections on the age of the frontier. Harper’s Magazine CCIII:26-33.
40. Worster, D. 1993. The Constitution and the land. Earth Ethics 4(summer):1-6.