The mentor effect in student evaluation

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 619-622

  Coulson, Carol C ^a   Kunselman, Allen R ^a   Cain, Joanna ^a   Legro, Richard S ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EXAMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENCE; TEACHER;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTORS; OBSTETRICS; ODDS RATIO; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034010096     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00612-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Heim P., Golant S.K. Hardball for women Winning at the game of business . 1992;RGA Publishing Group, Inc, Los Angeles, California.
2. Morzinski J.A., Diehr S., Bower D.J., Simpson D.E. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty. Fam Med. 28:1996;434-438.
3. Anderson P.C. Mentoring. Acad Med. 74:1999;4-5.
4. Fein R.L., Needell M.H. Early problems encountered with the mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 134:1985;62-64.
5. Homer. The odyssey. Rieu E.V. London. 1946;Penguin Books, United Kingdom.
6. Barrows H.S. The tutorial process, revised ed. 1998;Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.
7. Abernethy A.D. A mentoring program for underrepresented-minority students at the University of Rochester School of Medicine. Acad Med. 74:1999;356-359.
8. Nierenberg D.W. The challenge of "teaching" large groups of learners Strategies to increase active participation and learning . Int J Psychiatry Med. 28:1998;115-122.
9. Osborn E.H. Factors influencing students' choices of primary care or other specialities. Acad Med. 68:1993;572-574.
10. Dodson M.C. Motivation and reward factors that affect private physician involvement in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Obstet Gynecol. 92:1998;628-633.
11. Lipsitz S.H., Kim K., Zhao L. Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. Stat Med. 13:1994;1149-1163.
12. Woolson R.F. Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. 1987;333-344 John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
13. Shaw G.B. Pygmalion. 1975;Penguin Books, London, United Kingdom.
14. Griffith C.H. III, Wilson J.F., Haist S.A., Ramsbottom-Lucier M. Relationships of how well attending physicians teach to their students' performances and residency choices. Acad Med. 72:(suppl 1):1997;S118-S120.
15. Plauche W.C., Miller J.M. Jr. Performances of female medical students in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. J Med Educ. 61:1986;323-325.
16. Linn B.S., Zeppa R. Sex and ethnicity in surgical clerkship performance. J Med Educ. 55:1980;513-520.
17. Willoughby R.L., Arnold L.M. Women medical students' ratings of the required surgery clerkship Implications for career choice . J Am Med Wom Assoc. 47:1992;58-60.
18. Keitner G.I., Baldwin L.M., McKendall M.J. Gender and psychiatric clerkship performance. Can J Psychiatry. 29:1984;327-329.
19. Holmes F.F., Holmes G.E., Hassanenin R. Performance of male and female medical students in a medical clerkship. JAMA. 239:1978;2259-2262.
20. Krueger P.M. Do women medical students outperform men in obstetrics and gynecology? Acad Med. 73:1998;101-102.
21. Wang-Cheng R.M., Fulkerson P.K., Barnas G.P., Lawrence S.L. Effect of student and preceptor gender on clinical grades in an ambulatory care clerkship. Acad Med. 70:1995;324-326.