Cervical neoplasm;Les cancers de l'uterus

Feuillets de Radiologie

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 2-22

  Boulinguez, A ^a   Robert, Y ^a   Rocourt, N ^a   Damarey, I ^a   Querleu, D ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical neoplasms; MRI; Ultrasound; Uterine neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

EID: 0034009384     PISSN: 01819801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Magee BJ, Logue JP, Swindell R, McHugh D Tumour size as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the cervix assessment by transrectal ultrasound. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 812-815.
2. Chou C, Hsu K, Wang S, Huang PhD, Tzeng C, Huang K. Accuracy of three dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma. Radiologic Oncol 1997; 66: 89-93.
3. Yang W, Walkden S, Ho S, Cheung T, Lazm S, Ten J, Metreweli C Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1996: 69: 610-616.
4. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim HD, Lee HP, Kang SB, Lee JY, Han MC. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 633-640.
5. Tsuda K, Murakami T, Kurachi H, Ogawa H, Oi H, Miyake A, Narumi Y, Nakamura H. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma : comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22: 103-107.
6. Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, Sakai K. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1997; 168: 1579-1585.
7. Postema S, Peters LAW, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Pattynama PMT. Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T? J of Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 807-811.
8. Kim M, Chung J, Lee YH, Lee JT, Yoo HS. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma. AJR 1997; 168: 1215-1221.
9. Hulka CA, Hall DA, Mccarthy K, Simeone JF. Endometrial polyps, hyperplasia, and carcinoma in postmenopausal women: differentiation with endovaginal sonography. Radiology 1994; 191: 755-758.
10. Lin MC, Gosink BB, Wolf SI, Feldesman MR, Stuenkel CA, Braly PS, Pretorius DH Endometrial thickness after menopause: effect of hormone replacement. Radiology 1991; 180: 427-432.
11. Levine D, Gosink BB, Johnson LA. Change in endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Radiology 1995; 197: 603-608
12. Holbert TR. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1334-1339.
13. Stadkeviscius P, Valentin L, Marsal K. Endometrial thickness and Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries as discriminators of endometrial status in women with postmenopausal bleeding: A comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 722-728.
14. Sheth S, Hamper UM, Kurman RJ. Thickened endometrium in the postmenopausal woman: sonographic - pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187: 135-139
15. Kim SH, Kim HD, Song YS, Kang SB, Lee HP. Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound. CT and MRI. J of Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 766-772.
16. DelMaschio A. Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Spagnolo D, Belloni C, Garancini P, Taccagni GL. Estimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging. AJR 1993; 160: 533-538.
17. Seki H, Kimura M, Sakai K. Myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma: assessment with dynamic MR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 18-23.
18. Yarnashita Y, Mizutani H, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H, Ushijima H, Ohtake H, Tokunaga T. Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 1993; 161: 595-599.
19. Joja I, Asakawa M, Asakawa T, Nakagawa T, Kanazawa S, Kuroda M, Togami I, Hiraki Y, Akamaisu N, Kudo T. Endometrial carcinoma: dynamic MRI with Turbo-FLASH technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 878-887.
20. Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Flynn SD, Lange RC, Long F, Smith RC, Chambers SK, Kohorn E, Schwartz P, Chambers JT. Clinical stage 1 endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 567-572.
21. Roy C, Le Bras Y, Mangold L, Saussine C, Tuchmann C, Pfleger D, Jacqmin D. Small pelvic lymph node metastases: evaluation with MR imaging. Clin Radio; 1997; 52: 437-440.