Larger genomes for molluskan land pioneers

Genome

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 211-212

  Vinogradov, Alexander E ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Cytoecology; Flow cytometry; Genome base composition; Genome evolution; Genome size; Noncoding DNA

Indexed keywords

GENOME; MOLLUSC; PHYLOGENY;

AMPHIBIA; INVERTEBRATA; MOLLUSCA; PISCES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0034007566     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g99-063     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bennett, M.D. 1987. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytologist, 106(Suppl.): 177-200.
2. Bernardi, G., Hughes, S., and Mouchiroud, D. 1997. The major compositional transitions in the vertebrate genome. J. Mol. Evol. 44(Suppl. 1): S44-S51.
3. Boulikas, T. 1992. Evolutionary consequences of nonrandom damage and repair of chromatin domains. J. Mol. Evol. 35: 156-180.
4. Carels, N., Hatey, P., Jabbari, K., and Bernardi, G. 1998. Compositional properties of homologous coding sequences from plants. J. Mol. Evol. 46: 45-53.
5. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1978. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J. Cell Sci. 34: 247-278.
6. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1985. Cell volume and the evolution of eukaryote genome size. In The Evolution of Genome Size. Edited by T. Cavalier-Smith. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K. pp. 105-184.
7. Charlesworth, B., Sniegowski, P., and Stephan, W. 1994. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature (London), 371: 215-220.
8. Elder, J.F., Jr., and Turner, B.J. 1995. Concerted evolution of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotes. Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 297-320.
9. Pagel, M., and Johnstone, R.A. 1992. Variation across species in the size of the nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 249: 119-124.
10. Vinogradov, A.E. 1994. Measurement by flow cytometry of genomic AT/GC ratio and genome size. Cytometry, 16: 34-40.
11. Vinogradov, A.E. 1995. Nucleotypic effect in homeotherms: Body mass-corrected basal metabolic rate of mammals is related to genome size. Evolution, 49: 1249-1259.
12. Vinogradov, A.E. 1997. Nucleotypic effect in homeotherms: Body mass-independent resting metabolic rate of passerine birds is related to genome size. Evolution, 51: 220-225.
13. Vinogradov, A.E. 1998a. Buffering: A possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. J. Theor. Biol. 193: 197-199.
14. Vinogradov, A.E. 1998b. Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: The triangular relationship. Cytometry, 31: 100-109.
15. Vinogradov, A.E. 1999. Genome in toto. Genome, 42: 361-362.
16. Zardoya, R., and Meyer, A. 1996. Evolutionary relationships of the coelacanth, lungfishes, and tetrapods based on the 28S ribosomal RNA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 5449-5454.
17. Zardoya, R., and Meyer, A. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic information on the identity of the closest living relative(s) of land vertebrates. Naturwissenschaften, 84: 389-397.