Photographic sampling: A photographic sampling method for mites on plants

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 55-61

  Sircom, J ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Photographic sampling; Phytoseiidae; Phytoseiulus persimilis; Sampling; Tetranychidae; Tetranychus urticae

Indexed keywords

DENSITY; EGG; PEPPER; PHOTOGRAPHY; SAMPLING METHOD; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE;

MITE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLANT; SAMPLING;

ANIMALS; CAPSICUM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MITES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLANTS, MEDICINAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ACARI; ANIMALIA; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE; URTICAE;

EID: 0034003110     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006384715850     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Asquith, D. 1965. Photography in mite counting. J. Econ. Entomol. 58: 677-678.
2. Henderson, C.F. and McBurnie, H.V. 1943. Sampling techniques for determining populations of the red citrus mite and its predators. US Department of Agriculture Circular 671: 1-11, Washington, DC.
3. Lawson, A.B. and Walde, S.J. 1993. Comparison of the responses of two predaceous mites, Typhlodromus pyri and Zetzellia mali, to variation in prey density. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 17: 811-821.
4. Sabelis, M.W. 1985. Sampling techniques. In: Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1A, W. Helle, M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 337-350. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Takafuji, A. and Chant, D.A. 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Researches on Population Ecology 17: 255-310.
6. Walde, S.J. 1991. Patch dynamics of a phytophagous mite population: effect of number of subpopulations. Ecology 72: 1591-1598.