Genetic progress from 50 years of smooth bromegrass breeding

Crop Science

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-22

  Casler, M D ^a   Vogel, K P ^b   Balasko, J A ^c   Berdahl, J D ^d   Miller, D A ^e   Hansen, J L ^f   Fritz, J O ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^f Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^g KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FORAGE YIELD; GENETIC CHANGE; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC TRAIT; INHERITANCE; PLANT BREEDING; POLYPLOIDY; PYRENOPHORA BROMI; UNITED STATES;

BROMUS INERMIS;

EID: 0034003043     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.40113x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alderson, J., and W.C. Sharp. 1994. Grass varieties in the United States. USDA-SCS Agric. Handb. No. 170. Washington, DC.
2. Armstrong, K.C. 1985. Chromosome pairing failure in an intersectional amphiploid of Bromus-altissimus × B. arvensis. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27:705-709.
3. Armstrong, K.C. 1991. Chromosome evolution of Bromus. p. 363-377. In T. Tsuchiya and P.K. Gupta (ed.) Chromosome engineering in plants: Genetics, breeding, and evolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. Barnes, R.F, D.A. Miller, C.J. Nelson (ed.). 1995. Forages. Volume I. An introduction to grassland agriculture. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
5. Berg, C.C., R.T. Sherwood, and K.E. Zeiders. 1986. Recurrent phenotypic selection for resistance to brown leaf spot in smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci. 26:533-536.
6. Bremmer, J.M. 1996. Nitrogen-total. p. 1085-1121. In D.L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, WI.
7. Brownie, C., D.T. Bowman, and J.W. Burton. 1993. Estimating spatial variation in analysis of data from yield trials: a comparison of methods. Agron. J. 85:1244-1253.
8. Buxton, D.R., and M.D. Casler. 1993. Environmental and genetic effects on cell wall composition and digestibility. p. 685-714. In H.G. Jung et al. (ed.) Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
9. Buxton, D.R., K.P. Vogel, M.D. Cas,er, and K.J. Moore. 1995. Field survival of perennial forages divergently selected for digestibility. p. 163. In Agronomy abstracts. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
10. Carpenter, J.A., and M.D. Casler. 1990. Divergent phenotypic selection response in smooth bromegrass for forage yield and nutritive value. Crop Sci. 30:17-22.
11. Casler, M.D., and I.T. Carlson. 1995. Smooth bromegrass. p. 313-324. In R.F Barnes et al. (ed.) Forages. Volume I. An introduction to grassland agriculture. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
12. Casler, M.D., and K.P. Vogel. 1999. Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Sci. 39:12-20.
13. Dunn, G.M., and M. Nasiruddin. 1971. Cytogenetics of a temperature-sensitive albino mutant in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.). Crop Sci. 11:208-211.
14. Ehlke, N.J., M.D. Casler, P.N. Drolsom, and J.S. Shenk. 1986. Divergent selection for in vitro dry matter digestibility in smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci. 26:1123-1126.
15. Fehr, W.R. (ed.) 1984. Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants. CSSA Spec. Publ. No. 7. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
16. Frey, K.J. 1996. National plant breeding study - I. Special Rep. 98. Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
17. Ghosh, A.N., and R.P. Knowles. 1964. Cytogenetic investigations of a chlorophyll mutant in bromegrass, Bromus inermis Leyss. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 6:221-231.
18. Gross, D.F., C.J. Mankin, and J.G. Ross. 1975. Effect of diseases on in vitro digestibility of smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci. 15:273-275.
19. Knowles, R.P., and W.J. White. 1949. The performance of southern strains of bromegrass in western Canada. Sci. Agric. 29:437-450.
20. Milligan, G.W. 1980. An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrica 45:325-342.
21. Moore, K.J., L.E. Moser, K.P. Vogel, S.S. Waller, B.E. Johnson, and J.F. Pedersen. 1991. Describing and quantifying growth stages of perennial forage grasses. Agron. J. 83:1073-1077.
22. Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie, and D.A. Dickey. 1996. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.
23. Thomas, H.L., E.W. Hanson, and J.A. Jackobs. 1958. Varietal trials of smooth bromegrass in the North Central region. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Rep. 32.
24. Veronesi, F. 1991. Achievements in fodder crop breeding in mediterranean Europe. p. 25-30. In A.P.M. den Nijs and A. Elgersma (ed.) Fodder crops breeding: Achievements, novel strategies, and biotechnology. PUDOC, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
25. Vogel, K.P., K.J. Moore, and L.E. Moser. 1996. Bromegrasses. p. 535-567. In L.E. Moser et al. (ed.) Cool-season forage grasses. Agron. Monogr. 34. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
26. Vogel, K.P., J.F. Pedersen, S.D. Masterson, and J.J. Toy. 1999. Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Sci. 39:276-279.
27. Vogel, K.P., and D.A. Sleper. 1994. Alteration of plants via genetics and plant breeding. p. 891-921. In G.C. Fahey et al. (ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
28. Watson, M.E., and R.A. Issac. 1990. Analytical instruments for soil and plant analysis. p. 691-740. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil testing and plant analysis. 3rd ed. SSSA, Madison, WI.