Urine dipstick testing: Comparison of results obtained by visual reading and with the Bayer CLINITEK 50

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 220-221

  Rumley, Alan ^a  

^a GARTNAVEL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIPSTICK; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCREENING TEST; URINALYSIS;

EID: 0034001289     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0004563001899041     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Newall RG, Howell R, eds. Clinical Urinalysis. Stoke Poges: Ames Division, Miles Limited, 1990
2. Hutchison AS, Shenkin A. BM strips: how accurate are they in general wards? Diabetic Med 1984; 1: 225-6
3. Petranyi G, Petranyi M, Scobie I, Sonksen PH, Crane R, Roberts J, et al. Quality control of home monitoring of blood glucose concentrations. BMJ 1984; 288: 757
4. Bayer PLC. Multi-site clinical trials summary: CLINITEK 50 Urine Chemistry Analyser. Newbury: Bayer PLC, Diagnostics Division, 1998
5. Rumley AG. Improving the quality of near-patient blood glucose measurement. Ann Clin Biochem 1997; 34: 281-6