Accuracy of Cytological Findings in Abnormal Cervical Smears by Cytohistologic Comparison

Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-29

  Mostafa, Mohammed Golam ^a,b   Srivannaboon, Songsee ^a   Rachanawutanon, Mana ^b  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Cervical smear; Cervical smear cytology; Cytohistologic correlation; Pap smear

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; COLPOSCOPY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0033993353     PISSN: 03774929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pollack ES and Horn JW. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 64: 1091-1103, 1980.
2. Gusberg SB. Detection and prevention of uterine cancer. Cancer 62: 1784-1786, 1988.
3. Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for the cervical cancer detection; a triumph and a tragedy. JAMA 261: 737-743, 1989.
4. Anderson GH. Cytologic screening programs. In; Bibbo M, editor. Comprehensive Cytopathology. New York, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, pp 51-61, 1997.
5. Genack LJ and Schumann GB. Chain of events in Papanicolaou smear testing; impact on quality assurance. Diagn Cytopathol 5: 221-7, 1989.
6. Koss LG. Cytology; accuracy of diagnosis. Cancer: 249-257, 1989.
7. Richart RM and Vaillant HW. Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosis. Cancer 18: 1474-78, 1965.
8. Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathol Annu 8: 301-28, 1973.
9. DiBonito L, Falconieri G, Tomasic G, Colautti Im Bonifacio D and Dudine S. Cervical Cytopathology, an evaluation of its accuracy based on Cytohistologic comparison. Cancer 72: 3002-3006, 1993.
10. Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N, Sugihara K and Kashimura M. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization; diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy. Acta Cytol 40; 241-246, 1996.
11. Srisupunds S, Bullangpoti S. The correlation between colposcopic directed biopsy, cervical cytology and conization. J Med Asso Thai 62: 174-76, 1979.
12. Creasman WT and Rutledge F. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix; An analysis of 861 patients. Obstet and Gynecol 39: 373-380, 1972.
13. Jarmulowicz MR, Jenkins D, Barton SE, Goodall AL, Hollingworth A and Singer A. Cytological status and lesion size; A further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obsted Gynaecol 96: 1061-1066, 1989.
14. Rasbridge SA and Nayagam M. Discordance between cytologic and histologic reports in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; results of a one year audit. Acta Cytol 39: 648-653, 1995.
15. Attwood ME, Woodman CBJ, Luesley D and Jordan JA. Previous cytology in patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cyol 29: 100-110, 1985.
16. Smith KHS, Bostron SG and Galey WT. Correlation between Paps smears and cervical biopsies in an Air Force colposcopy clinic. J Reprod Med 30: 681-684, 1985.
17. Rammuo-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I and Gomousa M. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Acta Cytol 35: 69-75, 1991.
18. Boon ME, Guilloud JCG and Rietvld WJ. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol 33 843-848, 1989.
19. Richart RM. Evaluation of the true false negative rate in cytology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 89: 723-726, 1964.