Tilt dependency of slant aftereffect

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 349-357

  Seyama, Jun'ichiro ^a   Takeuchi, Tatsuto ^b   Sato, Takao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Slant; Slant aftereffect (SAE); Structure from motion; Surface; Tilt

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; NEURONS, AFFERENT; ORIENTATION;

EID: 0033992156     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00180-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Balch W., Milewski A., Yonas A. Mechanisms underlying the slant aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics. 21:1977;581-585.
2. Bergman R., Gibson J.J. The negative after-effect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. American Journal of Psychology. 72:1959;364-374.
3. Braddick O.J., Campbell F.W., Atkinson J. Channels in vision: basic aspects. Held R., Leibowitz H., Teuber H.L. Handbook of sensory physiology. 1978;Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
4. Braunstein M.L. Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1968;247-253.
5. Braunstein M.L., Payne J.W. Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81:1969;584-590.
6. Cagenello R., Rogers B.J. Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity. Vision Research. 33:1993;2189-2201.
7. Coltheart M. Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review. 78:1971;114-121.
8. Curran W., Johnston A. The effect of illuminant position on perceived curvature. Vision Research. 36:1996;1399-1410.
9. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Spatial vision. 1988;Oxford University, New York, NY.
10. Epstein W. The relationship between texture gradient and perceived slant-in-depth: direct or mediated? Perception. 10:1981;695-702.
11. Epstein W., Babler T. Perception of slant-in-depth is automatic. Perception and Psychophysics. 45:1989;31-33.
12. Frisby J.P. Seeing; illusion, brain and mind. 1979;Oxford University, Oxford.
13. Gibson J.J. The perception of visual surface. American Journal of Psychology. 63:1950;367-384.
14. Gillam B., Rogers B. Orientation disparity, deformation, and stereoscopic slant perception. Perception. 20:1991;441-448.
15. Horn B.K.P. Robot vision. 1986;MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16. Johnston A., Passmore P.J. Independent encoding of surface orientation and surface curvature. Vision Research. 34:1994a;3005-3012.
17. Johnston A., Passmore P.J. Shape from shading. I: surface curvature and orientation. Perception. 23:1994b;169-189.
18. Knill D.C., Liu Z. The perception of surface slant from texture. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 35:1994;1624.
19. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L. Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics. 52:1992;487-496.
20. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L. Depth and attitude probing in pictorial space. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 35:1994a;1627.
21. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L. On so-called paradoxical monocular stereoscopy. Perception. 23:1994b;583-594.
22. Köhler W., Emery D.A. Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. American Journal of Psychology. 60:1947;159-201.
23. Mamassian P., Kersten D. Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation. Vision Research. 36:1996;2351-2367.
24. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 200:1978;269-294.
25. Milewski A., Yonas A. Texture size specificity in the slant aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics. 21:1977;47-49.
26. Mingolla E., Todd J.T. Perception of solid shape from shading. Biological Cybernetics. 53:1986;137-151.
27. Pentland A.P. Local shading analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 6:1984;170-187.
28. Pollick F.E., Watanabe H., Kawato M. Perception of local orientation from shaded images. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;762-780.
29. Poom L., Börjesson E. Perceptual depth synthesis in the visual system as revealed by selective adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;504-517.
30. Ryan C., Gillam B. Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes. Perception. 23:1994;645-658.
31. Seyama J., Sato T. Shape from shading: estimation of reflectance map. Vision Research. 38:1998;3805-3815.
32. Smith A.H. Interaction of form and exposure time in the perception of slant. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 20:1965;481-490.
33. Spillman L, Warner J.S. Visual perception: the neurophysiological foundations. 1990;Academic, San Diego, CA.
34. Stevens K.A. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;47-73.
35. Stevens K.A. Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation. Biological Cybernetics. 46:1983a;183-195.
36. Stevens K.A. Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable. Perception and Psychophysics. 33:1983b;241-250.
37. Stevens K.A., Brookes A. Probing depth in monocular images. Biological Cybernetics. 56:1987;355-366.
38. Stevens K.A., Brookes A. Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research. 28:1988;371-386.
39. Sugihara H., Murakami I., Komatsu H., Shenoy K.V., Andersen R.A. Selectivity of neurons to the 3-D orientation of a rotating plane in area MSTd of the monkey. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 24:1998;649.
40. Todd J.T., Reichel F.D. Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. Psychological Review. 96:1989;643-657.
41. Wandell B. Foundations of vision. 1995;Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
42. Wenderoth P.M. A visual spatial aftereffect of surface slant. American Journal of Psychology. 83:1970;576-590.
43. Wenderoth P.M., Rodger R.S., Curthoys I.S. Confounding of psychophysical errors and sensory effects in adjustment measures of spatial aftereffects. Perception and Psychophysics. 4:1968;133-138.
44. Witkin A.P. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;17-45.
45. Woodham R.J. Analysing images of curved surfaces. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;117-140.