Latency shifts in the N2b component track phonological deviations in spoken words

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 40-44

  D'Arcy, Ryan C N ^a   Connolly, John F ^a   Crocker, Susan F ^a  

^a Life Sciences Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Language; Mismatch negativity; N2b; N400; Phonological mismatch negativity; Speech; Token Test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SPEECH;

EID: 0033990945     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00210-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 255:1992;556-559.
2. Boller F., Vignolo L.A. Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: An experimental study with the Token Test. Brain. 89:1966;815-831.
3. Connolly J.F., Phillips N.A. Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. J Cognit Neurosci. 6:(3):1994;256-266.
4. Connolly J.F., Stewart S.H., Phillips N.A. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences. Brain Lang. 39:1990;302-318.
5. D'Arcy RCN. Neuropsychological assessment of receptive language comprehension with event-related brain potentials. Unpublished thesis, 1998.
6. D'Arcy R.C.N., Connolly J.F. An event-related brain potential study of receptive speech comprehension using a modified Token Test. Neuropsychologia. 1999.
7. De Renzi E., Vignolo L.A. The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect disturbances in aphasics. Brain. 85:1962;665-678.
8. Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 24:1959;95-112.
9. Holcomb P.J., Neville H.J. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: a comparison using evoked potentials. Lang Cogn Proc. 5:1990;281-312.
10. Kutas M., Van Petten C. Psycholinguistics electrified: event-related brain potential investigations. Gernsbacher M.A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;83-143 Academic Press, San Diego.
11. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Ilvonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., Alho K. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature. 385:1997;432-434.
12. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: A powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear. 16:(1):1995;6-18.
13. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113.
14. Paulesu E., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature. 362:1993;342-344.
15. Pritchard W.S., Shappell S.A., Brandt M.E. Psychophysiology of N200/N400: a review and classification scheme. Ackles P.K., Jennings J.R., Coles M.G.H. Advances in psychophysiology. 1991;43-106 JAI press, Greenwich, CT.
16. Ritter W., Paavilainen P., Lavikainen J., Reinikainen K., Alho K., Sams M., Näätänen R. Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 83:1992;306-321.