Motion detection from photopic to low scotopic luminance levels

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 187-199

  Van De Grind, Wim A ^a,b   Koenderink, Jan J ^a,b   Van Doorn, Andrea J ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Luminance levels; Motion detection; Photopic; Scotopic

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMINESCENT MEASUREMENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0033990456     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00167-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anstis S.M. Apparent movement. Held R., Leibowitz H., Teuber H.L. Handbook of Sensory Physiology 8. 1978;655-673 Berlin, Springer Verlag.
2. Anstis S.M. Motion perception in the frontal plane. Sensory aspects. Boff K.R., Kaufman L., Thomas J.P. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. 1986;27 New York, John Wiley & Sons.
3. Crawford B.H. The change of visual sensitivity with time. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 123:1937;69-89.
4. Dawson M., Di Lollo V. Effects of adapting luminance and stimulus contrast on the temporal and spatial limits of short-range motion. Vision Research. 30(3):1990;415-429.
5. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research. 45:1982;179-188.
6. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research. 45:1982;189-195.
7. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J., Bouman M.A. The influence of retinal inhomogeneity on the perception of spatial patterns. Kybernetik. 10:1972;223-230.
8. Fredericksen R.E., Verstraten F.A.J., van de Grind W.A. An analysis of the temporal integration mechanism in human motion perception. Vision Research. 34(23):1994;3153-3170.
9. Gordon D.A. The relation between the thresholds of form, motion, and displacement in parafoveal and peripheral vision at a scotopic level of illumination. American Journal of Psychology. 60:1947;202-225.
10. Graham C.H. Perception of movement. Graham C.H., Bartlett N.R., Brown J.L., Hsia Y., Mueller C.G., Riggs L.A. Vision and visual perception. 1965;575-588 New York, John Wiley & Sons.
11. van de Grind W.A., van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 73:1983;1674-1683.
12. van de Grind W.A., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. The distribution of human motion detection properties in the monocular visual field. Vision Research. 26:1986;797-810.
13. van de Grind W.A., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Influence of contrast on foveal and peripheral detection of coherent motion in moving random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4:1987;1643-1652.
14. van de Grind W.A., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Viewing-distance invariance of movement detection. Experimental Brain Research. 91:1992;135-150.
15. van de Grind W.A., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Milders M.V., Voerman H. Inhomogeneity and anisotropies for motion detection in the monocular visual field of human observers. Vision Research. 33:1993;1089-1107.
16. Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. 1970;Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
17. Koenderink J.J., Bouman M.A., Bueno de Mesquita A.E., Slappendel S. Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sinewave patterns (I-IV). Journal of the Optical Society of America. 68:1978;845-865.
18. Leibowitz H.W. The relation between the rate threshold for the perception of movement and luminance for various durations of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49(3):1955;209-215.
19. Leibowitz H.W., Rodemer C.S., Dichgans J. The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error. Perception and Psychophysics. 25:1979;75-79.
20. McCourt M.F. Disappearance of grating induction at scotopic luminances. Vision Research. 30(3):1990;431-437.
21. van Meeteren A. On the detective quantum efficiency of the human eye. Vision Research. 18:1978;257-267.
22. Nakayama K. Biological image motion processing: A review. Vision Research. 25(5):1985;625-660.
23. Sakitt B. Counting every quantum. Journal of Physiology. 233:1972;131-150.
24. Sekuler R., Anstis S., Braddick O.J., Brandt T., Movshon J.A., Orban G. The perception of motion. Spillmann L., Werner J.S. Visual perception. The neurophysiological foundations. 1990;208-230 San Diego, Academic Press Inc.
25. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J. Visual detection of motion. 1994;Academic Press, London.
26. Snowden R.J., Hess R.F., Waugh S.J. The processing of temporal modulation at different levels of retinal illuminance. Vision Research. 35(6):1993;775-789.
27. Takeuchi T., De Valois K.K. Motion-reversal reveals two mechanisms functioning in scotopic vision. Vision Research. 37(6):1997;745-755.
28. Virsu V., Rovamo J. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research. 37:1974;475-494.