The use of microdialysis in the mouse: Conventional versus quantitative techniques

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 147, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 33-34

  Shippenberg, T S ^a   He, M ^a   Chefer, V ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE; NEUROTRANSMITTER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DOPAMINE RELEASE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MICRODIALYSIS; MOUSE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NEUROTRANSMITTER UPTAKE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN CHEMISTRY; DOPAMINE; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICRODIALYSIS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0033989749     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002130051138     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bungay PM, Morrison PF, Dedrick RJ (1990) Steady state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. Life Sci 47:105-119
2. Cosford RJ, Vinson AP, Kuklyi S, Justice JB (1996) Quantitative microdialysis of serotonin and norepinephrine: pharmacological influences on in vivo extraction fraction. J Neurosci Meth 68:39-47
3. Lonnroth P, Jansson PA, Smith UA (1987) Microdialysis method allowing characterization of intercellular water space in humans. Am J Physiol 253:E228-E231
4. Parsons LG, Justice JJ (1994) Quantitative approaches to in vivo brain microdialysis. Crit Rev Neurobiol 8:189-220
5. Slotnick BM, Leonard CM (1975) A stereotaxic atlas of the albino mouse forebrain. US Department Health, Education and Welfare, DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 75-100, Rockville, Md.