-
2
-
-
0021967425
-
A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter
-
Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:77-82.
-
(1985)
Ophthalmology
, vol.92
, pp. 77-82
-
-
Beck, R.W.1
Bergstrom, T.J.2
Lichter, P.R.3
-
3
-
-
0025635803
-
Does anyone know how to differentiate a "functional" defect from a cosmetic one ?
-
Anderson RL Holds JB. Does anyone know how to differentiate a "functional" defect from a cosmetic one [editorial]? Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1685-1686.
-
(1990)
Arch Ophthalmol
, vol.108
, pp. 1685-1686
-
-
Anderson, R.L.1
Holds, J.B.2
-
4
-
-
0003719661
-
-
Chicago. III: American Medical Association
-
American Medical Association. Guide to Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 3rd ed. Chicago. III: American Medical Association: 1990:161-172.
-
(1990)
Guide to Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 3rd Ed.
, pp. 161-172
-
-
-
5
-
-
0014113039
-
The influences of orbital contours and lid ptosis on the size of the peripheral visual field
-
Fischer RF. The influences of orbital contours and lid ptosis on the size of the peripheral visual field. Vis Res. 1967;7:671-678.
-
(1967)
Vis Res
, vol.7
, pp. 671-678
-
-
Fischer, R.F.1
-
7
-
-
0026592269
-
Visual field loss in primary gaze and reading gaze due to acquired blepharoptosis and visual field improvement following ptosis surgery
-
Patipa M. Visual field loss in primary gaze and reading gaze due to acquired blepharoptosis and visual field improvement following ptosis surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:63-67.
-
(1992)
Arch Ophthalmol
, vol.110
, pp. 63-67
-
-
Patipa, M.1
-
9
-
-
0027093476
-
Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty
-
Hacker HD, Hollsten DA. Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8: 250-255.
-
(1992)
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg
, vol.8
, pp. 250-255
-
-
Hacker, H.D.1
Hollsten, D.A.2
-
10
-
-
0027273369
-
Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry
-
Meyer DR, Stem JH, Jarvis JM, Lininger LL. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1993;100: 651-658.
-
(1993)
Ophthalmology
, vol.100
, pp. 651-658
-
-
Meyer, D.R.1
Stem, J.H.2
Jarvis, J.M.3
Lininger, L.L.4
-
11
-
-
0342539655
-
Discussion of above reference
-
Small RG. Discussion of above reference. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:658-659.
-
(1993)
Ophthalmology
, vol.100
, pp. 658-659
-
-
Small, R.G.1
-
12
-
-
0001313606
-
Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment: The visual system
-
The Committee on Rating of Mental and Physical Impairment of the American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment: the visual system. JAMA. 1958;168:475-485.
-
(1958)
JAMA
, vol.168
, pp. 475-485
-
-
-
13
-
-
0025789138
-
Functional vs cosmetic ophthalmologic defects
-
Small RG. Functional vs cosmetic ophthalmologic defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:1194-1195.
-
(1991)
Arch Ophthalmol
, vol.109
, pp. 1194-1195
-
-
Small, R.G.1
-
14
-
-
0020562754
-
A new technique of visual field evaluation for unilateral ptosis
-
Perlstein SH. A new technique of visual field evaluation for unilateral ptosis. Ann Ophthalmol. 1983;15:545-546.
-
(1983)
Ann Ophthalmol
, vol.15
, pp. 545-546
-
-
Perlstein, S.H.1
|