Patient access to their records: Rights or risks?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 141-142

  Anwar, Katharina ^a   O' Mahony, Fidelma ^a  

^a ROYAL SHREWSBURY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FORGERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; BACK PAIN; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0033989230     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11594.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Department of Health. Report of the Expert Maternity Group; Part 1. Changing Childbirth. London: HMSO, 1993.
2. Department of Health. A First Class Service: Quality in the New NHS. Health Service Circular, July 1998: 113.
3. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 101–106.
4. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk N. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 1996; 347: 544.
5. Enkin M, Keirse M, Chalmers I. A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
6. Neighbour R. The Inner Consultation: How to Develop an Effective and Intuitive Consulting Style. Plymouth: Petroc Press, 1987.