A geostatistical approach to optimize the determination of saturated hydraulic conductivity for large-scale subsurface drainage design in Egypt

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 291-312

  Moustafa, Mahmoud M ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Correlation model; Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Spatial variability; Subsurface drainage

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE BASIN; GEOSTATISTICS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; SOIL WATER;

EGYPT;

EID: 0033988959     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00042-6     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahuja L.R., Naney J.W., Green R.E., Nielsen D.R. Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1984;699-702.
2. Ahuja L.R., Cassel D.K., Bruce R.R., Barnes B.B. Evaluation of spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity using effective porosity data. Soil Sci. 148(6):1989;404-411.
3. Alemi M.H., Shahriari M.R., Nielsen D.R. Kriging and cokriging of soil water properties. Soil Techn. 1:1988;117-132.
4. Bakr A.A., Gelhar L.W., Gutjahr A.L., MacMillan J.R. Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows. 1. Comparison of one- and three-dimensional flows. Water Resour. Res. 14(2):1978;263-271.
5. Bouma J. Field measurement of soil hydraulic properties characterizing water movement through swelling clay soils. J. Hydrol. 45:1980;149-158.
6. Bouma J. Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci. 9:1989;177-213.
7. sat of clay soils with macropores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:1981;662-663.
8. Bouwer H. Planning and interpreting soil permeability measurements. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., ASCE. 95(3):1969;391-402.
9. Bouwer, H., Jackson, R.D., 1974. Determining soil properties. In: van Schilfgaarde, J. (Ed.), Drainage for Agriculture. American Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 611-674.
10. Butler, J.J. Jr., Healey, J.M., 1998a. Relationship between pumping-test and slug-test parameters: Scale effect or artifacts?. Ground Water, 36(2), 305-313.
11. Butler, J.J.Jr., Healey, J.M., 1998b. Discussion of papers 'Relationship between pumping-test and slug-test parameters: Scale effect or artifacts?' Ground Water, 36(6), 867-868.
12. Camp, C.R., 1977. Determination of hydraulic conductivity for a Louisiana alluvial soil. ASAE Third National Drainage Symposium Proceedings, Chicago, IL. pp. 104-108.
13. Chong S.K., Green R.E., Ahuja L.R. Simple in situ determination of hydraulic conductivity by power function descriptions of drainage. Water Resour. Res. 17(4):1981;1109-1114.
14. D'Agostino R.B., Belanger A., D'Agostino R.B. A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am. Stat. 44:1990;316-321.
15. Dorsey J.D., Ward A.D., Fausey N.D., Bair E.S. A comparison of four methods for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Trans. ASAE. 33(6):1990;1925-1931.
16. El-Mowelhi N.M., van Schilfgaarde J. Computation of soil hydrological constants from field drainage experiments in some soils in Egypt. Trans. ASAE. 25(4):1982;984-986.
17. FAO, 1976. Drainage testing. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 28, FAO, Rome.
18. Franzmeier D.P. Estimation of hydraulic conductivity from effective porosity data for some Indiana soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1991;1801-1803.
19. Gallichand J., Prasher S.O., Broughton R.S., Marcotte D. Kriging of hydraulic conductivity for subsurface drainage design. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 117(5):1991;667-681.
20. Gallichand J., Marcotte D., Prasher S.O. Including uncertainty of hydraulic conductivity into drainage design. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 118(5):1992;744-756.
21. Gupta R.K., Rudra R.P., Dickinson W.T., Patni N.K., Wall G.J. Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measured by various field methods. Trans. ASAE. 36(1):1993;51-55.
22. Jabro J.D. Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Trans. ASAE. 35(2):1992;557-560.
23. Jones A.J., Wagenet R.J. In situ estimation of hydraulic conductivity using simplified methods. Water Resour. Res. 20:1984;1620-1626.
24. Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C.J., 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London.
25. Kirkham, Don, 1965. Saturated conductivity as a charactizer of soil for drainage design. Drainage for efficient crop production Conference. ASAE, Chicago, St. Joseph, MI. pp. 24-31.
26. Kitanidis, P.K., 1993. Geostatistics. In: Maidment, D.R. (Ed.), Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. pp. 20.1-20.39.
27. Matheron G. Composition des permeabilites en milieu poreux heterogene: methode de Schwyndler et regles de ponderation (in French). Revue de l'Institut Francais du Petrole. 22(3):1967;443-466.
28. Mohanty B.P., Kanwar R.S., Horton R. A robust-resistant approach to interpret spatial behavior of saturated hydraulic conductivity of a glacial till soil under no-tillage system. Water Resour. Res. 27(11):1991;2979-2992.
29. Mohanty B.P., Kanwar R.S., Everts C.J. Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measurement methods for a glacial-till soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:1994;672-677.
30. Moustafa M.M. Verification of impermeable barrier depth and effective radius for drain spacing using exact solution of the steady state flow to drains. Irrigation Drainage Systems. 11(4):1997;283-298.
31. Moustafa M.M., Yomota A. Use of a covariance variogram to investigate influence of subsurface drainage on spatial variability of soil-water properties. Agric. Water Manage. 37(1):1998;1-19.
32. Mulla D.J. Estimating spatial patterns in water content, matric suction, and hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52(6):1988;1547-1553.
33. Prasher S.O., Denis Russell S.O., Podmore T.H., Chieng S.T. First and second order analysis of parameter uncertainty in drainage design. Trans. ASAE. 27(4):1984;1081-1086.
34. Puckett W.E., Dane J.H., Hajek B.F. Physical and mineralogical data to determine soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:1985;831-836.
35. Rawls W.J., Brakensiek D.L., Logsdon S.D. Predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity utilizing fractal principles. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1993;1193-1197.
36. Reynolds, W.D., Elrick, D.E., Baumgartner, N., Clothier, B.E., 1984. The 'Guelph Permeameter' for measuring the field-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity above the water table. II. The apparatus. Proc. Canadian Hydrology Symposium, Quebec.
37. Reynolds W.D., Zebchuk W.D. Hydraulic conductivity in a clay soil: two measurement techniques and spatial characterization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:1996;1679-1685.
38. Rogers J.S. Finite element model of flow to an auger hole in layered soils. Trans. ASAE. 29(4):1986;1005-1011.
39. Rogers J.S., Carter C.E. Auger hole hydraulic conductivity determination in layered soils. Trans. ASAE. 30(2):1987;374-378.
40. Rogers J.S., Selim H.M., Carter C.E., Fouss J.L. Variability of auger hole hydraulic conductivity values for a commerce silt loam. Trans. ASAE. 34(3):1991;876-882.
41. Romano N. Use of an inverse method and geostatistics to estimate soil hydraulic conductivity for spatial variability analysis. Geoderma. 60:1993;169-186.
42. Sanchez-Vila X., Carrera J., Girardi J.P. Scale effects in transmissivity. J. Hydrol. 183:1996;1-22.
43. Schwab, G.O., Fangmeier, D.D., Elliot, W.J., 1996. Soil and Water Management Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
44. Skaggs, R.W., 1976. Determination of the hydraulic conductivity-drainable porosity ratio from water table measurements. Trans. ASAE. 19(1), 73-80; 84.
45. Tietje O., Hennings V. Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedo-transfer function compared to the variability within FAO textural classes. Geoderma. 69:1996;71-84.
46. Topp G.C., Binns M.R. Field measurement of hydraulic conductivity with a modified air-entry permeameter. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56:1976;139-147.
47. Topp G.C., Zebchuk W.D., Dumanski J. The variation of in situ measured soil water properties within soil map units. Can. J. Soil Sci. 60:1980;497-509.
48. Van Beers, W.F.J., 1983. The auger hole method. International Institute of Land Reclamation and Improvements, Wageningen, The Netherlands, Bull. No. 1.
49. Van Schilfgaarde, J., 1970. Theory of flow to drains. In: Chow, V.T. (Ed.), Advances in Hydroscience. Academic Press, London. pp. 6: 43-106.
50. Vereecken H. Estimating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from theoretical models using simple soil properties. Geoderma. 65:1995;81-92.
51. Vieira S.R., Nielsen D.R., Biggar J.W. Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45(6):1981;1040-1048.
52. Warrick, A.W., Nielsen, D.R., 1980. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In: Hillel, D. (Ed.), Applications of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York. pp. 319-344.