Enantiomer fractions are preferred to enantiomer ratios for describing chiral signatures in environmental analysis

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 218-220

  Harner, Tom ^a   Wiberg, Karin ^b   Norstrom, Ross ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ENANTIOMER FRACTION; ENANTIOMER RATIO;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; CHIRALITY; DEGRADATION; ENANTIOMER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033987892     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es9906958     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bidleman, T. F.; Falconer, R. L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 206, 6A-209A.
2. Jantunen, L. M.; Bidleman, T. F. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 28837-28846; corrections J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 702, 19279-19282.
3. Jantunen, L. M.; Bidleman, T. F. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 28837-28846; corrections J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 19279-19282.
4. Ridal, J. J.; Bidleman, T. F.; Kerman, B. R.; Fox, M.; Strachan, W. M. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 1940-1945.
5. Bidleman, T. F.; et al. Environ. Pollut. 1998, 102, 43-49.
6. Harner, T.; Kylin, H.; Bidleman, T. F.; Strachan, W. M. J. Environ. Sci Technol. 1999, 33, 1157-1164.
7. Wiberg, K.; et al. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3845-3852.
8. Möller, K.; Bretzke, C.; Hühnerfuss, H.; Kallenbron, R.; Kinkel, J. N.; Kopf, J.; Rimkus, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 882-884.
9. Mössner, S.; Spraker, T. R.; Becker, P. R.; Ballschmiter, K. Chemosphere 1992, 24, 1170-1180.
10. Wiberg, K.; et al. (submitted).
11. Bidleman, T. F.; Falconer, R. L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 2299-2301.
12. Buser, H.-R.; Müller, M. D. Environ. Sci Technol. 1995, 29, 664-672.