Intimate examinations: Use of chaperones in communitybased family planning clinics

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 130-132

  Khan, Noreen S ^a   Kirkman, Rosemary ^a  

^a Palatine Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ETHNIC GROUP; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL STATUS;

ADULT; ASIA; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ENGLAND; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; WEST INDIES;

EID: 0033987887     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11590.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Working Party Report. Intimate examinations. London : Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, September, 1997.
2. Areskog-Wijma B. The gynaecological examination: womens' experiences and preferences and the role of the gynaecologist. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 6: 59-69.
3. Qureshi B. Multicultural aspects of contraception. Update 1988; 37: 406-410.
4. Speelman A, Savage J, Verburgh M. Use of chaperones by general practitioners. BMJ 1993; 307: 986-987.
5. Thompson S, Skinner K, Kirkman RJE. Would you rather be seen by the nurse Br J Fam Plan 1996; 22: 130-133.
6. Randall S. Intimate examination. Br J Fam Plan 1998; 24: 83-84.