Comparison of algorithms for classifying Swedish landcover using Landsat TM and ERS-1 SAR data

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-15

  Michelson, Daniel B ^a   Liljeberg, B Marcus ^b   Pilesjö, Petter ^b  

^a SWEDISH METEOROLOGICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BACKPROPAGATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; RADAR IMAGING; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; VEGETATION;

BAYESIAN IMAGE SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; LANDCOVER;

REMOTE SENSING;

ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0033987880     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00024-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ardö J., Pilesjö P., Skidmore A.K. Neural networks, multi temporal TM data and topographic data to classify forest damages in the Czech Republic. Can. J. Remote Sens. 23:1997;217-229.
2. Arheimer, B., Grahn, G., Roos, E., and Wittgren, H. B. (1998), Modelling retention in created wetlands - influence of potential wetlands on nitrogen transport in the Genevad River Basin, Report to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, S-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden.
3. Arheimer B., Wittgren H.B. Modelling the effects of wetlands on regional nitrogen transport. Ambio. 23:1994;378-386.
4. Beale R., Jackson T. Neural Computing. An Introduction:1991;Adam Hilger, Bristol.
5. Benediktsson J.A., Swain P.H., Ersoy O.K. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of MultiSource Remote Sensing data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 28:1990;540-551.
6. Bischof H., Schneider W., Pinz A.J. Multispectral classification of Landsat-images using neural networks. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 30:1992;482-490.
7. Bouman C., Shapiro M. A multiscale model for Bayesian image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 3:1994;162-177.
8. Bouman, C., and Shapiro, M. (1996), SMAP Image Segmentation Software Package User's Manual, School of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, http://dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu/~bouman/ .
9. Brisco B., Brown R.J. Multidate SAR/TM Synergism for Crop Classification in Western Canada. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 61:1995;1009-1014.
10. CHIPS (1992), CHIPS Satellite Image Processing System v. 3.0 User's Guide, Routine Reference and Technical Reference, Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
11. Civco D.L. Artificial neural networks for landcover classification and mapping. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 7:1993;173-186.
12. Congalton R. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37:1991;35-46.
13. Fleischer S., Stibe L. Drainage basin management - reducing river transported nitrogen. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 24:1991;1753-1755.
14. Foody G.M., McCulloch M.B., Yates W.B. The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural network classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 16:1995;1707-1723.
15. Frost V.S., Stiles S.A., Shanmugan K.S., Holtzman J.C. A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 4:1982;157-165.
16. Israelsson H., Askne J. Retrieval of forest biomass using SAR. Askne J. Sensors and Environmental Applications of Remote Sensing. 1995;97-102 Balkema, Rotterdam.
17. Kanellopoulos I., Varfis G., Wilkinson G.G., Megeir J. Land-cover discrimination in SPOT HRV imagery using an artificial neural network-a 20 class experiment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 13:1992;917-924.
18. Karlsson K.-G. Cloud climate investigations in the Nordic Region using NOAA AVHRR data. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 57:1997;181-195.
19. Kuan D.T., Sawchuck A.A., Strand T.C., Chavel P. Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 7:1985;165-177.
20. Laur, H. (1992), Derivation of backscattering coefficient σ° in ERS-1.SAR.PRI Products, Issue 1, Rev. 0, Technical report, ESA ESRIN. Noordwijk.
21. Lee J.S. Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 2:1980;165-168.
22. Lippman R.P. An Introduction to Computing with Neural Nets. IEEE ASSP Mag. April:1987;4-22.
23. Lopes A., Touzi R., Nezry E. Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 28:1990;992-1000.
24. Markham, B. L., and Barker, J. L., (1986), Landsat MSS and TM post calibration dynamic ranges. Exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures, EOSAT, Landsat Technical Notes No. 1, Technical report, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD.
25. McCauley J.D., Engel B.A. Comparison of scene segmentations. SMAP, ECHO and maximum likelihood IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 33:1995;1313-1316.
26. Michelson D.B., Seaquist J.W. Change detection in Swedish landcover from a year of ERS-1 SAR data. Askne J. Sensors and Environmental Applications of Remote Sens. 1995;123-129 Balkema, Rotterdam.
27. Mitch W.J. Landscape design and the role of created, restored, and natural riperian wetlands in controlling nonpoint source pollution. Ecol. Eng. 1:1992;27-47.
28. PCI EASI-PACE Software, Version 6.0.1. 1995;PCI Inc, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.
29. Peddle D.R., Foody G.M., Zhang A., Franklin S., Ellsworth F.L. Multi-source image classification II. An empirical comparison of evidential reasoning and neural network approaches Can. J. Remote Sens. 20:1994;396-407.
30. Richards J.A. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. An Introduction. 2nd ed:1995;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
31. Rissanen J. A universal prior for integers and estimation by minimum description length. Ann. Stat. 11:1983;417-431.
32. Ritter H., Martinetz T., Schulten K. Neural Computing and Self-Organizing Maps. 1991;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
33. Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L. (1986), Parallel Distributed Processing, Technical Report, MIT Bradford Press, Cambridge, MA, Vol. 1.
34. Sandholt I. Combining Data in Remote Sensing. Land Use Classification:1996;Dina Research Report No. 55, Dina KVL, Fredriksberg, Denmark.
35. Shi Z., Fung K.B. A comparison of digital speckle filters. IGARSS Proc. IEEE Symp. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1994;2129-2132 IEEE, New York.
36. Skidmore, A. K., Brinkhof, W., and Delaney, J. (1994), Using neural networks to analyse spatial data. In Proc. 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, Melbourne, Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Assoc. Australia Ltd., Floreat, WA, Australia, pp. 235-246.
37. Skidmore A.K., Brinkhof W., Turner B.J. Performance of neural networks for forest mapping from GIS and remotely sensed data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63(5):1997;501-514.
38. SMHI (1996), SVAR-databasen, Avrinningsområden i Sverige Del 4 Vattendrag till Västerhavet. Hydrologi 70, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, S-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden (in Swedish).
39. Solberg A.H.S., Jain A.K., Taxt T. Multisource classification of remotely sensed data. fusion of Landsat TM and SAR images IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 32:1994;768-778.
40. Solberg A.H.S., Taxt T., Jain A.K. A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 34:1996;100-113.
41. Sui D.Z. Recent applications of neural networks for spatial data handling. Can. J. Remote Sens. 20:1994;368-380.
42. Swain P.H. Fundamentals of pattern recognition in remote sensing. Swain P.H., Davis S.M. Remote Sensing. The Quantitative Approach:1978;136-187 McGraw-Hill, New York.