Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidies by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization: A one-year clinical experience with high-risk and urgent fetal and postnatal samples

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 8-14

  Bryndorf, Thue ^b   Lundsteen, Claes ^b   Lamb, Allen ^a   Christensen, Britta ^b   Philip, John ^b  

^a GENZYME GENETICS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Chromosome aberrations; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Prenatal diagnosis methods; Prospective study

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DNA PROBE; FETUS; FETUS BLOOD; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; ANEUPLOIDY; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; DNA PROBES; FEMALE; FETAL BLOOD; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPING; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033987668     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079001008.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. 1. Klinger K, Landes G, Shook D et al. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 1992; 51: 55-65.
2. 2. Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 52: 854-65.
3. 3. Bryndorf T. Development and clinical studies of in situ hybridization techniques in prenatal diagnosis. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45: 298-312.
4. 4. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M et al. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59: 918-26.
5. 5. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M et al. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies by FISH: experience with 2,000 uncultured amniotic fluid samples in a prospective preclinical trial. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 333-41.
6. 6. Tabor A, Lind AM, Andersen AM et al. A culture vessel for amniotic fluid cells allowing faster preparation of chromosome slides. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4: 451-5.
7. 7. Smidt-Jensen S, Christensen B, Lind AM. Chorionic villus culture for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome defects: reduction of the long-term cultivation time. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9: 309-19.
8. 8. Lebo RV; Flandermeyer RR, Diukman R et al. Prenatal diagnosis with repetitive in situ hybridization probes. Am J Med Genet 1992; 43: 848-54.
9. 9. Jørgensen FS. User acceptability of an alpha-fetoprotein screening programme. Dan Med Bull 1995; 42: 100-5.
10. 10. Moskowitz J, Ward BE, Weinstein M. Optimized amniocentesis methods enhance performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 394.