Use of mass spectrometry for assessing similarity/diversity of natural products with unknown chemical structures

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1197-1214

  Schoonjans, V ^a   Questier, F ^a   Borosy, A P ^b   Walczak, B ^c   Massart, D L ^a   Hudson, B D ^d  

^a PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^d GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fingerprint; Mass spectra; Similarity; Wallace's measure; Ward's hierarchical clustering

Indexed keywords

ACEBUTOLOL; ALKALOID; ALPRENOLOL; AMIODARONE; ATENOLOL; BETAXOLOL; CAMPHOR; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; DIGITOXIN; DOPAMINE; EPHEDRINE; ESTRADIOL; FLURAZEPAM; LIDOCAINE; LORMETAZEPAM; LYSERGIDE; MELATONIN; MENTHOL; METOPROLOL; MORPHINE; NADOLOL; NATURAL PRODUCT; NICOTINE; OXPRENOLOL; PARATHION; PRENALTEROL; PROCAINE; PROGESTERONE; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;

EID: 0033986973     PISSN: 07317085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00236-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dean P.M. Molecular Similarity in Drug Design. 1995;Blackie Academic Professional, London.
2. Flower D.R. On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:1998;379-386.
3. Rose V.S., Rahr E., Hudson B.D. The use of procrustes analysis to compare different property sets for the characterization of a diverse set of compounds. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 13:1994;152-158.
4. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;572-584.
5. C.A. James, D. Weininger, Daylight Theory Manual, Daylight Chemical Information Systems, 3951 Claremont St, Irvine, California 92714, USA, 1993.
6. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;1-9.
7. Downs G.M., Willet P. Similarity searching and clustering of chemical-structure databases using molecular property data. J. Chem. Inf. Sci. 34:1994;1094-1102.
8. Baumann K., Clerc J.T. Computer-assisted IR spectra prediction-linked similarity searches for structures and spectra. Anal. Chim. Acta. 348:1997;327-343.
9. Shemetulskis N.E., Weininger D., Blankley C.J., Yang J.J., Humblet C. Stigmata: an algorithm to determine structural commonalities in diverse datasets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;862-871.
10. Barnard J.M., Downs G.M. Clustering of chemical structures on the basis of 2-D similarity measures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32:1992;644-649.
11. Hardcastle W.A. Towards a strategy for structure elucidation. Spectrosc. Eur. 10:1998;1.
12. Massart D.L., Kaufman L. The Interpretation of Analytical Chemical Data by Use of Cluster Analysis. 1983;Wiley, New York.
13. Vogt W., Nagel D., Sator H. Cluster Analysis in Clinical Chemistry: A Model. 1987;Wiley, New York.
14. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Buydens L.M.C., De Jong S., Lewi P.J, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Data handling in science and technology. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A-B. 1997;Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. Eriksson L. A strategy for ranking environmentally occurring chemicals. Chemom. Intell. Labor. Syst. 5:1989;169-186.
16. Martin E.J., Blaney J.M., Siani M.A., Spellmeyer D.C., Wong A.K., Moos W.H. Measuring diversity: experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 38:1995;1431-1436.