Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 129-134

  Leonard, Franck ^a   Lecuru, Fabrice ^a,b   Rizk, Elie ^a   Chasset, Sophie ^a   Robin, François ^a,b   Taurelle, Roland ^a,b  

^a Hopital Boucicaut   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Complication rate; Gynecological laparoscopy; Perioperative morbidity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; NEEDLE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL RISK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; OBSTETRIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0033976157     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079002129.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, Madelenat P, Fernandez H, Pierre F et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Human Reprod 1998; 13: 867-72.
2. 2. Harkki-Siren P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 108-12.
3. 3. Jansen F, Kapiteyn K, Tribos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbis J. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 595-600.
4. 4. MacCordick C, Lécuru F, Rizk E, Robin F, Boucaya V, Taurelle R. Morbidity of laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. Results of a prospective monocenter study. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 57-61.
5. 5. Mirhashemi R, Harlow B, Ginsburg E, Signorello L, Berkowitz R, Feldman S. Predicting risks of complications with gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 327-31.
6. 6. Chapron C, Querleu D, Mage G, Madelenat P, Dubuisson JB, Audebert A et al. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Multicentre study about 7604 procedures. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1992; 21: 207-13.
7. 7. Lécuru F. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 681-2.
8. 8. Riedel H, Lehman-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Semm K. The frequency distribution of various pelviscopic operations, including complications rates statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983-1985. Zentrabl Gynekol 1989; 111: 78-91.
9. 9. Peterson H, Hulka J, Philipps J. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1988 membership survey on operative laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 587-9.
10. 10. Yuzpe A. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy. A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 485-90.
11. 11. Pierre F, de Poncheville L, Chapron C. A French survey on gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1761.
12. 12. Saidi MH, Vancaillie TG, White AJ, Sadler RK, Akright BD, Farhart SA. Complications of advanced operative laparoscopy: A review of 452 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1 (4 part 2): S31.
13. 13. Bateman BG, Kolp LA, Hoeger K. Complications of laparoscopy - operative and diagnostic. Fertil Steril 1996; 66 (I): 30-5.
14. 14. Richardson RE, Sutton CJ. Veress needle complications: a prospective audit. 7th Congress of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy. Lausanne, 6-9 Dec, 1998.
15. 15. Rosen D, Lam A, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario G. Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53: 167-74.
16. 16. Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy: a report of 150 cases. J Reprod Med 1974; 12: 234-8.
17. 17. Woolcot R. The safety of laparoscopy performed by direct trocar insertion and carbon dioxide insufflation under vision. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37: 216-19.
18. 18. Byron J, Markenson G, Miyazawa K. A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177: 259-62.
19. 19. Peitgen K, Nimtz K, Hellinger A, Walz MK. Open approach or Veress needle in laparoscopic interventions? Results of a prospective randomized controlled study. Chirurg 1997; 68: 910-13.
20. 20. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta F, Micali B. Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8: 353-5.
21. 21. Brill A, Nehzat F, Nehzat C, Nehzat C. The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 269-72.
22. 22. Chapron C, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson JB. Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185: 461-5.
23. 23. Lécuru F, Robin F, Neji K, Darles C, De Bievre P, Vildé F et al. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in an anatomical model. Results of an experimental comparative trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol Reprod 1997; 72: 51-5.