Hierarchical logistic regression models for clustered binary outcomes in studies of IVF-ET

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 575-581

  Hogan, Joseph W ^a   Blazar, Andrew S ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated data; Embryo implantation; Heterogeneity; Hydrosalpinx; Mixed model; Random effects; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE TUBE DISEASE;

ADULT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; LOGISTIC MODELS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0033974877     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00577-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Huber P.J. Robust statistics a review . Ann Math Stat. 43:1972;1041-1067.
2. Laird N.M., Ware J.H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 38:1982;963-974.
3. Stiratelli R., Laird N.M., Ware J.H. Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics. 40:1984;961-971.
4. Zeger S.L., Liang K.Y., Albert P.S. Models for longitudinal data a generalized estimating equation approach . Biometrics. 44:1988;1049-1060.
5. Breslow N.E., Clayton D.G. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 88:1993;9-25.
6. Hedeker D., Gibbons R.D., Flay B.R. Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 62:1994;757-765.
7. Zeger S.L., Karim M.R. Generalized linear models with random effects a Gibbs sampling approach . J Am Statistical Assoc. 86:1991;79-86.
8. McDonough P.G. Sleepless nights for SART investigators? [letter] Fertil Steril. 71:1999;394-395.
9. Hierarchical generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Series B 1996;58:619-56.
10. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 2nd ed. 1995;Arnold, London.
11. Bartholomew D.J. Latent variable models and factor analysis. 1987;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Watier L., Richardson S., Hémon D. Accounting for pregnancy dependence in epidemiologic studies of reproductive outcomes. Epidemiology. 8:1997;629-636.
13. Zeger S.L., Liang K.Y. An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Stat Med. 11:1992;1825-1839.
14. Blazar A.S., Hogan J.W., Seifer D.B., Frishman G.N., Wheeler C.A., Haning R.V. The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 67:1997;517-520.
15. Gelfand A.E., Smith A.F.M. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc. 85:1990;398-409.
16. Hedeker D., Gibbons R. MIXOR a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis . Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 49:1996;157-176.
17. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Gilks WR. Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling, Version 0.50. Cambridge, UK: MRC Biostatistics Unit, 1995.
18. Zhou H.B., Weinberg C.R. Potential for bias in estimating human fecundability parameters a comparison of statistical models . Stat Med. 18:1999;411-422.
19. Hogan J.W., Laird N.M. Mixture models for the joint distribution of repeated measures and event times. Stat Med. 16:1997;239-258.
20. Wu M.C., Carroll R.J. Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring by modeling the censoring process. Biometrics. 44:1988;175-188.
21. Diggle P., Kenward M.G. Informative dropout in longitudinal studies. Appl Stat. 43:1994;49-93.
22. Nackley A.C., Muasher S.J. The significance of hydrosalpinx in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 69:1998;373-384.