The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): Ecological, concurrent and construct validity

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 33-45

  Norris, Gus ^a   Tate, Robyn L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL REHABILITATION CENTRE SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033974803     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096020100389282     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, C.V., Bigler, E.D., & Blatter, D.D. (1995). Frontal lobe lesions, diffuse damage, and neuropsychological functioning in traumatic brain-injured patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 900-908.
2. Andrews, G., Peters, L., & Teesson, M. (1994). The measurement of consumer outcome in mental health, Sydney, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
3. Beatty, W.W. (1990). Cognitive and emotional disturbances in multiple sclerosis. Behavioural Neurology, 11, 189-205.
4. Bennett-Levy, J. (1984). Determinants of performance on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test: An analysis, and a new technique for single case measurement. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 109-119.
5. Borkowski, J.G., Benton, A.L., & Spreen, O. (1967). Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 5, 135-140.
6. Corwin, P.A., & Blysma, F.W. (1993). Trans: Rey, A. Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy; Osterreith PA. The Complex Figure Copy Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 3-21.
7. Girard, D., Brown, J., Burnett-Stolnack, M., Hashimoto, N., Hier-Wellmer, S., Perlman, O.Z., & Seigerman, C. (1996). The relationship of neuropsychological status and productive outcomes following traumatic brain injury Brain Injury, 10, 663-676.
8. Goodman, S.H., Sewell, D.R., Cooley, E.L., & Leavitt, N. (1993). Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: The Role Functioning Scale. Community Mental Health Journal, 29, 119-131.
9. Hartman, D.E. (1996). Ecological validity and the evolution of clinical neuropsychology. In R.J. Sbordone & C.J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, (pp. 113-128). Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press.
10. Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Talley, J.L., Kay, C.G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Hohol, M.J., Orav, E.J., & Weiner, H.L. (1995). Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: A simple approach to evaluate disease progression. Neurology, 45, 251-255.
12. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Long, C.J. (1996). Neuropsychological tests: A look at our past and the impact that ecological issues may have on our future. In R.J. Sbordone & C.J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, (pp. 1-14). Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press.
14. Lyons, J.S., Howard, K.I., O'Mahoney, M.T., & Lish, J.D. (1997). The measurement and management of clinical outcomes in mental health. New York: John Wiley.
15. McPheeters, H.L. (1984). Statewide mental health outcome evaluation: A perspective of two southern states. Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 44-55.
16. Mountain, M.A., & Snow, W.G. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 108-118.
17. Nelson, H.E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313-324.
18. Nelson, H.E., & Willison, J.R. (1991). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual (2nd ed.) Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
19. Porteus, S.D. (1965). Porteus Maze Test. Fifty years' application. New York: Psychological Corporation.
20. Reitan, R.M., & Wolfson, D. (1994). A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes. Neuropsychology Review, 4, 161-197.
21. Sbordone, R.J. (1996). Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. In R.J. Sbordone & C.J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, (pp. 15-42). Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press.
22. Shallice, T., & Burgess, P.W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741.
23. Shallice, T., & Evans, M.E. (1978). The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex, 14, 294-303.
24. Stuss, D.T., & Benson, D.F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press.
25. Stuss, D.T., Gow, C.A., & Heatherington, C.R. (1992). "No longer Gage": Frontal lobe dysfunction and emotional changes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 349-359.
26. Tupper, D.E., & Cicerone, K.D. (1990). Introduction to the neuropsychology of everyday life. In D.E. Tupper & K.D. Cicerone (Eds.), The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies, (pp. 3-18). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
27. Wilson, B.A. (1993). Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment: Do neuropsychological indexes predict performance in everyday activities. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2, 209-215.
28. Wilson, B.A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P.W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J.J. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
29. Wilson, B.A., Evans, J.J., Emslie, H., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P.W. (1998). The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 213-228.