Ethics in surgery: Historical perspective

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 10-13

  Tung, Thomas ^a   Organ Jr , Claude H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Surgery ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HISTORY; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT RIGHT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGERY;

EID: 0033971554     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.1.10     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc: 1995:2605-2630.
2. Crawshaw R. Link C. Evolution of form and circumstance in medical oaths. West J Med. 1996;164:452-456.
3. Dickstein E, Erlen J. Ethical principles contained in currently professed medical oaths. Acad Med. 1991;66:622-624.
4. Gillon R. Medical oaths, declarations and codes. BMJ. 1985;290:1194-1195.
5. Baker R, Caplan A, Emanuel LL, Latham SR. Crisis, ethics, and the American Medical Association 1847 and 1997. JAMA. 1997;278:163-164.
6. Hanlon CR. Ethics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:41-49.
7. Pellegrino ED. The metamorphosis of medical ethics: a 30-year retrospective. JAMA. 1993;269:1158-1162.
8. Pellegrino ED. Ethics. JAMA. 1996;275:1807-1809.
9. Marketos SG, Diamandopoulos AA, Bartsocas CS, Poulakou-Rebelakou E, Koutras DA. The hippocratic oath. Lancet. 1996;347:101-102.
10. Bloom DA. Hippocrates and urology: the first surgical subspecialty. Urology. 1997; 50:157-158.
11. Robin ED, McCauley RF. Cultural lag and the hippocratic oath. Lancet. 1995;345: 1422-1424.
12. Jonsen AR, reviewer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1792. Review of: McCullough LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine.
13. Jonsen AR, reviewer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1792. Review of: McCullough LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine.
14. Shuster E. The Nuremberg Code: hippocratic ethics and human rights. Lancet. 1998;351:974-977.
15. Kassirer JP. Managing care: should we adopt a new ethic? N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:397-398.
16. Blume E. Hippocratic oath versus managed care: physicians caught in ethical squeeze. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:543-545.
17. Patterson RH. A code of ethics. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:271-277.
18. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Code of Ethics: September 1993. Arch Surg. 1996;131:900-901.
19. Fearnside MA. Code of ethics for the college. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64:226.
20. The Writing Group for the Consortium for Health and Human Rights. Health and human rights: a call to action on the 50th anniversary of the universal declaration of human rights. JAMA. 1998;280:462-464, 469-470.