Single species conservation in a multispecies fishery: The case of the Australian eastern gemfish

Ecological Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 125-136

  Pascoe, Sean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic modeling; Bycatch; Linear programming; Species conservation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BYCATCH; CONSERVATION PLANNING; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 0033970596     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00073-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ABARE, 1993a. Annual Fisheries Statistics 1993. ABARE, Canberra.
2. ABARE, 1993b. Fisheries Surveys Report 1993. ABARE, Canberra.
3. Bishop R.C. Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard. Am. J. Agric. Econom. 60:1978;10-18.
4. Boyle K.J., Bishop R.C. Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analyses: a case study involving endangered species. Water Resour. Res. 23:1987;943-950.
5. AFMA, 1997. News from the Board. Professional Fisherman. June 1997, 12.
6. Anderson L.G. Analysis of open-access commercial exploitation and maximum economic yield in biologically and technologically interdependent fisheries. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32:1975;1825-1842.
7. Anderson L.G. The economics of multi-purpose fleet behavior. Murman L.J., Spulber D.F. Essays in the Economics of Renewable Resources. 1982;New Holland.
8. Bragg J. Myths of salmon recovery. Pacific Fishing (August). 15:1994;33-37.
9. Brown B.E., Brennan J.A., Palmer J.E. Linear programming simulations of the effects of bycatch on the management of mixed species fisheries off the Northeastern coast of the United States. Fish. Bull. 76:1978;851-860.
10. Bureau of Resource Science, 1998. Fisheries Status Report 1998. AGPS, Canberra.
11. Cheng K.S., Lin C.J., Wang A.Y. Analysis of modified model for commercial fishing with possible extinctive fishery resources. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 8:1981;151-155.
12. Clark C.W. Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. 2nd edition:1990;John Wiley, New York.
13. Clark C.W., Munro G.R., Charles A.T. Fisheries, dynamics and uncertainty. Scott A. Progress in Natural Resource Economics. 1985;99-120 Clarendon Press, Great Britain.
14. Eagle J.G., Betters D.R. The endangered species act and economic values: a comparison of fines and contingent valuation studies. Ecol. Econom. 26:1998;165-171.
15. Ess C. AK Salmon: less fish, more money. Pacific Fishing (October). 15:1994;16-17.
16. Frost H., Rodgers P., Valatin G., Lantz F., Lewy P., Vestergaard N. A Bioeconomic Model of the North Sea Multispecies Multiple Gears Fishery. 1993;South Jutland University Press, Esbjerg.
17. Kailola P.J., Williams M.J., Stewart P.C., Reichelt R.E., McNee A., Grieve C. Australian Fisheries Resources. 1993;Bureau of Resource Science, Canberra.
18. Kirkley J.E., Strand I.E. The technology and management of multispecies fisheries. Appl. Econom. 20:1988;1279-1292.
19. Lewis Y. Life support for Columbia salmon. Pacific Fishing (November). 15:1994;42-53.
20. Loomis J.B., White D.S. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: a summary and meta-analysis. Ecol. Econom. 18:1996;197-206.
21. Mardle, S., Pascoe, S., Tamiz, M. and Jones D. 1999. Resource allocation in the North Sea: an application of multi-objective programming. Annals of Operations Research [in press].
22. Moyle B. Species conservation and the principal-agent problem. Ecol. Econom. 26(3):1998;313-321.
23. Murawski S.A., Finn J.T. Optimal effort allocation among competing mixed species fisheries, subject to fishing mortality constraints. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 43:1985;90-100.
24. Nicholls R. Geelong brings a resolve to make workshop better. Aust. Fish. 52:1993;6-10.
25. Oreskes N., Shrader-Frechette K., Belitz K. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science. 263:1994;646.
26. Pascoe S. ITQs in the south east fishery. Marine Resour. Econom. 8:1993;395-401.
27. Pascoe, S. 1997. A preliminary bioeconomic model of the UK component of the fisheries of the English Channel, CEMARE Research Paper P 112, CEMARE.
28. Pascoe, S. 1998. Bycatch Management and the Economics of Discarding. FAO Fisheries Technical Report 370, FAO, Rome, 140p.
29. Rowlings K. Eastern gemfish. will they come back? Aust. Fish. 54:1995;8-9.
30. Rubin J., Helfand G., Loomis J. A benefit-cost analysis of the northern spotted owl. J. For. (December). 89:1991;25-30.
31. Schellberg T. The problem of non-malleable capital revisited: a study of the Pacific halibut fishery. Nat. Resour. Model. 7:1993;245-276.
32. Siegel R.A., Mueller J.J., Rothschild B.J. A linear programming approach to determining harvesting capacity: a multiple species fishery. Fish. Bull. 77:1979;425-433.
33. Sinclair S.F. A linear programming analysis of Scotian Shelf offshore fisheries. Mahon R Towards the Inclusion of Fisheries Interactions in Management Advice (Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science No 1347). 1985;92-103.
34. Thunberg E.M., Bresnyan E.W., Adams C.M. Economic analysis of technical interdependencies and the value of effort in a multi-species fishery. Marine Resour. Econom. 10:1995;59-76.
35. Vestergaard N. Discard behavior, highgrading and regulation: the case of the Greenland shrimp fishery. Marine Resour. Econom. 11(4):1996;247-266.
36. Weisbuch G., Stanley E.A., Duehateau-Nguyen G., Antona M., Clement-Pitiot H. Influence of capital inertia on renewable resource depletion. Theory Biosci. 116(2):1997;97-117.