The relative influence of lesion length and other stenosis morphologies on procedural success of coronary intervention

Angiology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-52

  Iliadis, Elias A ^a   Zaacks, Stephen M ^a   Calvin, James E ^a   Allen, Jill ^a   Parrillo, Joseph E ^a   Klein, Lloyd W ^a  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0033969349     PISSN: 00033197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100108     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baim D: Cardiac catheterization. In: Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography and Intervention, ed. by Baim GW. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1996, pp 247-302.
2. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al: Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 78:486-502, 1988.
3. Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, and co-investigators of the NHLBI PICA Registry: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. N Engl J Med 318:265-270, 1988.
4. Ryan TJ, Barman WB, Kennedy JW, et al: ACC/AHA Task Force Report: Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:2033-2054, 1993.
5. Brymer JF, Khaja F, Kraft PL: Angioplasty of long or tandem coronary artery lesions using a new longer balloon dilatation catheter: A comparative study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 23:84-88, 1991.
6. Roubin GS, Douglas JS, King SB III: Influence of balloon size on initial success, acute complications and restenosis after PTCA. Circulation 78:557-565, 1988.
7. Botas J, Stadius ML, Bourassa MG, et al: Angiographic correlates of lesion relevance and suitability for PTCA and CABG in the BARI study. Am J Cardiol 77:805-814, 1996.
8. Zaacks SM, Calvin JE, Schaer GL, et al: The value of the ACC/AHA stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990's. Am J Cardiol 1998 (in press).
9. Savage MP, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld JW, and the M-Heart Investigators: Clinical and angiographic determinants of primary coronary angioplasty success. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:22-28, 1991.
10. Moushmoush B, Kramer B, Hseih AM, et al: Does the AHA/ACC task force grading system predict outcome in multivessel coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 27:97-105, 1992.
11. Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, et al: Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: Current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1641-1652, 1992.
12. Ellis SG, Vandermael MG, Cowley MJ, et al, and the Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group: Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease-implications for patient selection. Circulation 82:1193-1202, 1990.
13. Cannon AD, Roubin GS, Hearn JA, et al: Acute angiographic and clinical results of long balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and adjuvant stenting for long narrowing. Am J Cardiol 73:635-641, 1994.
14. Sharma SK, Israel DH, Kamean JL, et al: Clinical, angiographic and procedural determinants of major and minor coronary dissection during angioplasty. Am Heart J 126:39-47, 1993.
15. Ellis S: Coronary lesions at increased risk. Am Heart J 130:643-646, 1995.
16. Tenaglia AN, Fortin DF, Califf RM, et al: Predicting the risk of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty in an individual patient. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:1004-1011, 1994.