Multiple paths of sugar-sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 51, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2000, Pages 417-427

  Koch, Karen E ^a   Ying, Zeng ^a   Wu, Yong ^a   Avigne, Wayne T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol dehydrogenase; Invertase; Sucrose synthase; Sugar sensing

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0033969179     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.417     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bailey-Serres J, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Freeling M. 1988. Genetic and molecular approaches to the study of the anaerobic response and tissue specific gene expression in maize. Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 351-357.
2. Bell GI, Pilkis SJ, Weber IT, Polonsky KS. 1996. Glucokinase mutations, insulin secretion, and Diabetes mellitus. Annual Reviews of Physiology 58, 171-186.
3. Bonny JM, Saglio PH. 1996. Glycolytic flux and hexokinase activities in anoxic maize root tips acclimated by hypoxic pretreatment. Plant Physiology 111, 187-194.
4. Chiou JJ, Bush DR. 1998. Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 4784-4788.
5. De Winde JH, Crauwels M, Hohmann S, Theveleiin JM, Winderickx J. 1996. Differential requirement of the yeast sugar kinases for sugar sensing in establishing the catabolize-repressed state. American Journal of Biochemistry 241, 633-643.
6. 14C-labeled glucose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, 13147-13159.
7. Dolferus R, Jacob M, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. 1994. Differential interactions of promoter elements in stress responses of the Arabidopsis alcohol dehydrogenase gene. Plant Physiology 105, 1075-1087.
8. Douglas P, Pigaglio E, Ferrer A, Halford NG, Mackintosh C. 1997. Three spinach leaf nitrate reductase 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase kinases that are regulated by reversible phosphorylation and/or calcium ions. Biochemistry Journal 325, 101-109.
9. Drew MC. 1997. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: Injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 223-250.
10. Ehness R, Ecker M, Godt D, Roitsch T. 1997. Glucose and stress independently regulate source sink relations and defense mechanisms via signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation. The Plant Cell 9, 1825-1841.
11. Farrar JF, Williams JHH. 1991. Control of the rate of respiration in roots: compartmentation, demand and the supply of substrate. In: Emes M, ed. Compartmentation of metabolism. Butterworths, 167-188.
12. Fennoy SL, Bailey-Serres J. 1995. Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in oxygen-deprived roots of maize. The Plant Journal 7, 287-295.
13. Fennoy SL, Nong T, Bailey-Serres J. 1998. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes regulate gene expression in oxygen-deprived roots of maize. The Plant Journal 15, 727-735.
14. Ferl RJ. 1996. 14 3-3 proteins and signal transduction. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 49-73.
15. Fox TC, Green BJ, Kennedy RA, Rumpho ME. 1998. Changes in hexokinase activity in Echinochloa phyllopogon and Echinochloa crus-pavonis in response to abiotic stress. Plant Physiology 118, 1403-1409.
16. Galina A, Reis M, Albuquerque MC, Puyou AG, Puyou MTG, De Meis L. 1995. Different properties of the mitochondrial and cytosolic hexokinases in maize roots. Biochemistry Journal 309, 105-112.
17. Gancedo JM. 1998. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 62, 334-361.
18. Germain V, Ricard B, Raymond P, Saglio PH. 1997. The role of sugars, hexokinase, and sucrose synthase in the determination of hypoxically induced tolerance to anoxia in tomato roots. Plant Physiology 114, 167-175.
19. Godt DE, Reigel A, Roitsch T. 1995. Regulation of sucrose synthase expression in Chenopodium rubrum: characterization of sugar induced expression in photoautotrophic suspension cultures and sink tissue specific expression in plants, Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 231-238.
20. Halford NG, Hardie DG. 1989. SNF1-related protein kinases: global regulators of carbon metabolism in plants? Plant Molecular Biology 37, 735-748.
21. Halford NG, Purcell, PC, Hardie DG. 1999. Is hexokinase really a sugar sensor in plants? Trends in Plant Science 4, 117-104.
22. Heineke D, Sonnewald U, Bussis D, Gunter G, Leidreiter, K, Wilke I, Rashke K, Willmitzer L, Heldt HW. 1992. Apoplastic expression of yeast-derived invertase in potato. Effects on photosnthesis, leaf soluble composition, water relations, and tuber composition. Plant Physiology 100, 301-308.
23. Herbers K, Meuwly P, Frommer W, Metraux J-P, Sonnewald U. 1996. Systematic acquired resistance mediated by the ectopic expression of invertase: possible hexose sensing in the secretory pathway. The Plant Cell 8, 793-803.
24. Hochachka PW, Buck LT, Doll CJ, Land SC. 1996. Unifying theory of hypoxia tolerance: molecular/metabolic defense and rescue mechanisms for surviving oxygen lack. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 9493-9498.
25. Ishiguro S, Nakamura K. 1994. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5′ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and beta-amylase from sweet potato. Molecular and General Genetics 244, 563-571.
26. Jang JC, Sheen J. 1997. Sugar sensing in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 2, 208-214.
27. Jang JC, León P, Zhou L, Sheen J. 1997. Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. The Plant Cell 9, 5-19.
28. Johnston M. 1999. Feasting, fasting and fermenting: glucose sensing in yeast and other cells. Trends in Genetics 15, 29-33.
29. Kanayama Y, Granot D, Dai N, Petreikov M, Schaffer A, Powell A, Bennet AB. 1998. Tomato fructokinase exhibit differential expression and substrate regulation. Plant Physiology 117, 85-90.
30. Koch KE. 1997. Molecular crosstalk and the regulation of C-and N-responsive genes. In: Foyer C, Quick P, eds. A molecular approach to primary metabolism in plants. London: Taylor and Francis Inc., 105-124.
31. Koch KE. 1996. Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 509-540.
32. Koch KE, Wu Y, Xu J. 1996. Sugar and metabolic regulation of genes for sucrose metabolism: Potential influence of maize sucrose synthase and soluble invertase responses on carbon partitioning and sugar sensing. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1179-1185.
33. Koch KE, Nolte KD, Duke ER, McCarty DR, Avigne WT. 1992. Sugar levels modulate differential expression of maize sucrose synthase genes. The Plant Cell 4, 59-69.
34. Lalonde S, Boles E, Hellmann H, Barker L, Patrick JW, Frommer WB, Ward JM. 1999. The dual function of sugar carriers: transport and sugar sensing. The Plant Cell 11, 707-726.
35. 6 zinc cluster transcriptional activator: a new role for SNF1 in the glucose response. Molecular and Cellular Biology 16, 1921-1928.
36. Martin T, Hellman H, Schmidt R, Willmitzer L, Frommer WB. 1997. Identification of mutants in metabolically regulated gene expression. The Plant Journal 11, 53-62.
37. Martinez-Barajas E, Luethy MH, Randall DD. 1997. Molecular cloning and analysis of fructokinase expression in tomato (Lycopersicon esmlenlum Mill.). Plant Science 125, 13-20.
38. McCarty DR, Shaw JR, Hannah LC. 1986. The cloning, genetic mapping, and expression of the constitutive sucrose synthase locus of maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 83, 9099-9103.
39. Meijer MMC, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT. 1998. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 24102-24107.
40. Moorhead G, Douglas P, Cotelle V, Harthill J, Morrica N, Meek S, Deiting U, Stitt M, Scarabel M, Aitken A, MacKinstosh C. 1999. Phosphorylation-dependent interactions between enzymes of plant metabolism and 14 3-3 proteins. The Plant Journal 18, 1-12.
41. Nairn JC, Winesett L, Ferl RJ. 1988. Nucleotide sequence of an actin gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 65, 247-257.
42. Newgaard CB, McGarry JD. 1995. Metabolic coupling factors in pancreatic beta-cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Biochemistry 64, 689-719.
43. 2 partial pressure within plant tissues. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 447-454.
44. 2+ signalling in the sugar-inducible expression of genes coding for sporamin and beta amylase of sweet potato. The Plant Journal 7, 297-307.
45. Ohio M, Nakamura K. 1995. Sugar-induced increase of calcium-dependent protein kinases associated with the plasma membrane in leaf tissues of tobacco. Plant Physiology 109, 937-981.
46. Plaxton WC. 1996. The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 41, 185-214.
47. Purcell PC, Smith AM, Halford NG. 1998. Antisense expression of a sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase sequence in potato results in decreased expression of sucrose synthase in tubers and loss of sucrose-inducibility of sucrose synthase transcripts in leaves. The Plant Journal 14, 195-202.
48. Rasschaert J, Malaisse WJ. 1990. Hexose metabolism in pancreatic islets: preferential utilization of mitochondrial ATP for glucose phosphorylation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1015, 353-360.
49. Renz A, Stitt M. 1993. Substrate specificity and product inhibition of different forms of fructokinases and hexokinases in developing potato tubers. Planta 190, 166-175.
50. Roitsch T, Bittner M, Godt DE. 1995. Induction fo apoplastic invertase of Chenopodiuni rubrum by D-glucose and a glucose analog and tissue-specific expression suggest a role in sink source regulation. Plant Physiology 108, 285-294.
51. Roberts DM, Harmon AC. 1992. Calcium-modulated proteins. targets of intracellular calcium signals in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Molecular Bialogy and Plant Physiology 43, 375-414.
52. Roscher A, Emsley L, Raymond P, Roby C. 1998. Unidirectional steady state rates of central metabolism enzymes measured simultaneously in a living plant tissue. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 25053-25061.
53. Sachs MM, Subbaiah CC, Saab IN. 1996. Anaerobic gene expression and flooding tolerance in maize: glycolytic and XET genes and signal transduction. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1-15.
54. Smeekens S. 1998. Sugar regulation of gene expression in plants. Plant Biology 1, 230-234.
55. Smeekens S, Rook F. 1997. Sugar sensing and sugar-mediated signal transduction in plants. Plant Physiology 115, 7-13.
56. Sugden C, Donahgy PG, Halford, NG, Hardie DG. 1999. Two SNF1-related protein kinases from spinach leaf phosphorylate and inactivate 3-hydroxy-3-methylglularyl-coenzyme A reductase, nitrate reductase, and sucrose phosphate synthase in vivo. Plant Physiology 120, 257-274.
57. Springer B, Werr W, Starlinger P, Bennett DC, Zokolica M, Freeling M. 1986. The Shrunken gene on chromosome 9 of Zea mays L. is expressed in various plant tissues and encodes an anaerobic protein. Molecular and General Genetics 205, 461-468.
58. Talierico EW, Chourey PS. 1989. Post-transcriptional control of sucrose synthase expression in anaerobic seedlings of maize. Plant Physiology 90, 1359-1364.
59. 2 concentrations. Plant Physiology 96, 1294-1301.
60. Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB. 1997. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Annals of Botany 79, 3-20.
61. + efflux and hexose transport under imposed energy status in maize root tips. Plant Physiology 93, 453-459.
62. Xu J, Avigne WT, McCarty DR, Koch KE. 1996. A similar dichotomy of sugar modulation and developmental expression affects both paths of sucrose metabolism: evidence from a maize invertase gene family. The Plant Cell 8, 1209-1220.
63. Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE. 1998. Differential regulation of sugar-sensitive sucrose syntheses by hypoxia and anoxia indicate complementary transcriptional and post-transcriptional responses. Plant Physiology 116, 1573-1583.