Routine automated laboratory methods are inadequate to determine the number of platelets in blood salvaged and processed for autotransfusion

Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 33-36

  Lorentz, A ^a   Waibel, H ^b   Becker, P ^b   Bender, J ^b   Nebe, T C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Flow cytometric analysis; Intra and postoperative autotransfusion; Platelets

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BLOOD AUTOTRANSFUSION; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THROMBOCYTE COUNT;

EID: 0033968657     PISSN: 10198466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000025239     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Klinger MUF, Klüter H: Platelets are circulating stores for adhesive proteins, inflammatory mediators and immunoglobulines - role in nonhemolytic transfusion reactions. Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1999;26:20-25.
2. Kongsgaard UE, Hovig T, Brosstad F, Geiran O: Platelets in shed mediastinal blood used for postoperative autotransfusion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993;37:265-268.
3. Sloand E, Alyono D, Yu M, Klein H: Platelet membrane glycoproteins and microvesicles in blood from postoperative salvage: A study in cardiac bypass patients. Transfusion 1995;35:738-744.
4. v d Borne AE, Modderman PW: Cluster report: CD42; in: Knapp W (ed): Leucocyte Typing IV: White Cell Differentiation Antigens. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp 1000-1002.
5. Rowan RM: Platelet counting and the assessment of platelet function; in Koepke JA (ed.): Practical Hematology. New York, Livingston, 1991, pp 157-170.
6. Akwari AM, Ross DW, Stass SA: Spuriously elevated platelet count due to microspherocytosis. Am J Cin Pathol 1982;77:220-221.
7. Stass SA, Holloway ML, Schumacher HR: Cytoplasmatic fragments causing spurious platelet counts in the leukemic phase of poorly differentiated lymphotic lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1979;71: 125-128.
8. Menges M, Bissinger KR, Krieger G, Hack G: Diagnostische und intensivmedizinische Probleme beim Hämolytisch-Urämischen Syndrom (HUS). Anästhesiol Intensivmed Nolfallmed Schmerzther 1994;29:375-378.
9. v Bormann B, Weidler B, Holleufer R, Müller-Wiefel H, Trobisch H: Alternative maschinelle Autotransfusion. Hämofiltration vs. Hämoseparation. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1992;27:11-17.
10. Connall TP, Zhang J, Vaziri ND, Kaupke CJ, Wilson SE: Leukocyte CD11b and CD18 expression are increased in blood salvaged for autotransfusion. Am Surg 1994;60:797-800.
11. Perttilä J, Leino L, Pöyhönen M, Salo M: Leucocyte content in blood processed by autotransfusion devices during open-heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:445-448.
12. Walpoth BH, Eggensperger N, Walpoth-Aslan N, Neidhart P, Lanz M, Spaeth G, Kurth G, Althaus U: Aufbereitung von autologem Oxygenatorblut mit dem kontinuierlichen Autotransfusionssystem (CATS); in Mempel W (ed): Abstraktband der 9. Informationstagung über Eigenblut. München, 1996.
13. Pipa A, Petersen J, Hergert M: Maschinelle Autotransfusion: Vergleich gewaschener Erythrozyten konzentrate mit biochemischen, härnatologischen und mikroskopischen Verfahren; in Mempel W (ed): Abstraktband der 10. Informationstagung über Eigenblut. München, 1997.
14. v. Finck M, Schmidt R, Schneider W, Feine U: Die Qualität gewaschener autotransfundierter Erythrozyten. Anaesthesist 1986;35:686-692.
15. Lorentz A, Reinhard M, Andres F-J, Osswald PM, Jani L: Stellenwert der intra- und postoperativen Autotransfusion beim Austausch einer Hüftgelenk-endoprothese. Anaesthesist 1989;8:1-9.