Strategies to optimize marker-assisted introgression of multiple unlinked QTL

Mammalian Genome

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 145-150

  Koudandé, O Delphin ^a   Iraqi, Fuad ^b   Thomson, Peter C ^d   Teale, Alan J ^c   Van Arendonk, Johan A M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; GENE LOCATION; GENE TARGETING; GENOTYPE; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; CROSSES, GENETIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 0033968465     PISSN: 09388990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003350010028     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Darvasi A, Soller M (1994) Optimum spacing of genetic markers for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet 89, 351-357
2. Frankel WN, Schork NJ (1996) Who's afraid of epistasis? Nat Genet 14, 371-373
3. Gama LT, Smith C, Gibson JP (1992) Transgene effects, introgression strategies and testing schemes in pigs. Anim Prod 54, 427-440
4. Groen AF, Smith C (1995) A stochastic simulation study of the efficiency of marker-assisted introgression in livestock. J Anim Breed Genet 112, 161-170
5. Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147, 1469-1485
6. Kashi Y, Hallerman E, Soller M (1990) Marker assisted selection of candidate bulls for progeny testing programmes. Anim Prod 51, 63-74
7. Kemp SJ, Iraqi F, Darvasi A, Soller M, Teale AJ (1997) Localization of genes controlling resistance to trypanosomiasis in mice. Nat Genet 16, 194-196
8. Koudandé OD, Thomson PC, van Arendonk JAM (1999) A model for population growth of laboratory animals subjected to marker assisted introgression: how many animals do we need? Heredity 82, 16-24
9. Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124, 743-756
10. Markel P, Shu P, Ebeling C, Carlson GA, Nagle DL et al. (1997) Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains. Nat Genet 17, 280-283
11. Spelman RJ, Bovenhuis H (1998) Moving from QTL experimental results to the utilisation of QTL in breeding programmes. Anim Genet 29, 77-84
12. van der Waaij EH, van Arendonk JAM (1999) Introgression of genes responsible for disease resistance in an otherwise for production selected cattle population: genetic and economic consequences. Anim Sci, in press
13. Visscher PM, Haley CS (1999) On the efficiency of marker-assisted introgression. Anim Sci 68, 59-68
14. Visscher PM, Haley CS, Thompson R (1996) Marker-assisted introgression in backcross breeding programs. Genetics 144, 1923-1932
15. Wakeland E, Morel L, Achey K, Yui M, Longmate J (1997) Speed congenics: a classic technique in the fast lane (relatively speaking). Immunol Today 18, 472-477
16. Yancovich A, Levin I, Cahanar A, Hillel J (1996) Introgression of the avian naked neck gene assisted by DNA fingerprints. Anim Genet 27, 149-155