Resistant responses of peach somaclone 122-1 to Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni and to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae

HortScience

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 141-143

  Hammerschlag, F A ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial canker; Bacterial leaf spot; Disease resistance; Prunus persica; Somaclonal variation

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PRUNUS; PRUNUS PERSICA; PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV. SYRINGAE; XANTHOMONAS ARBORICOLA PV. PRUNI; XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS;

EID: 0033965902     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.35.1.141     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. De Vries, R.M. and C.T. Stephens. 1997. Response of first generation tomato somaclone progeny to Clavibactermichiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Plant Sci. 126:69-77.
2. Donovan, A.M., R. Morgan, C. Valobra-Piagnani, M.S. Ridout, D.J. James, and C.M. Garrett. 1994. Assessment of somaclonal variation in apple. I. Resistance to the fire blight pathogen, Erwinia amylovora. J. Hort. Sci. 69:105-113.
3. Evans, D.A. and W.R. Sharp. 1983. Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture. Science 221:949-951.
4. Hammerschlag, F.A. 1982a. Factors affecting establishment and growth of peach shoot tips in vitro. HortScience 17:85-86.
5. Hammerschlag, F.A. 1982b. Factors influencing in vitro multiplication and rooting of the plum rootstock Myrobalan (Prunus cerasifera Ehr.). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107:44-47.
6. Hammerschlag, F.A. 1988. Selection of peach cells for insensitivity to culture filtrates of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni and regeneration of resistant plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:865-869.
7. Hammerschlag, F.A. 1990. Resistant responses of plants regenerated from peach callus to Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115:1034-1037.
8. Hammerschlag, F.A., G. Bauchan, and R. Scorza. 1985. Regeneration of peach plants from callus derived from immature embryos. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:248-251.
9. Hammerschlag, F.A., G. Bauchan, and R. Scorza. 1987. Factors influencing in vitro multiplication and rooting of peach cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 8:235-242.
10. Hammerschlag, F.A. and V. Ognjanov. 1990. Somaclonal variation in peach: Screening for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni and Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Acta Hort. 280:403-408.
11. Hammerschlag, F.A., D.J. Werner, and D.F. Ritchie. 1994. Stability of bacterial leaf spot resistance in peach regenerants under in vitro, greenhouse and field conditions. Euphytica 76:101-106.
12. Hashmi, G.P., F.A. Hammerschlag, and R.N. Huettel. 1995. Growth, development, and response of peach somaclones to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:932-937.
13. Heath-Pagliuso, S., J. Pullman, and L. Rappaport. 1988. Somaclonal variation in celery: Screening for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii, race 2. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:446-451.
14. King, E.O., M.K. Ward, and D.E. Raney. 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44:301-307.
15. Larkin, P.J., S.A. Ryan, R.I.S. Brettell, and W.R. Scowcroft. 1984. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:443-455.
16. Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft. 1981. Somaclonal variation - A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60:197-214.
17. Latunde-Dada, A.O. and J.A. Lucas. 1988. Somaclonal variation and resistance to Verticillium wilt in lucerne, Medicago sativa L., plants regenerated from callus. Plant Sci. 58:111-119.
18. Miller, R.W. 1994. Estimated peach tree losses 1980 to 1992 in South Carolina - Causes and economic impact. Proc. Stone Fruit Decline Wkshp. 6:121-127.
19. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.
20. Ogawa, J.M. and H. English. 1991 Diseases of temperate zone tree fruit and nut crops. Publication 3345. Univ. of Calif. Div. Agr. Natural Res., Oakland.
21. Randhawa, P.S. and E.L. Civerolo. 1985. A detached leaf bioassay for Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. Phytopathology 75:1060-1063.
22. SAS Institute. 1997. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, ver. 6.12. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
23. Scorza, R. and F.A. Hammerschlag. 1992. Stone fruits, p. 277-301. In: F.A. Hammerschlag and R.E. Litz (eds.). Biotechnology of perennial fruit crops. CAB Intl., Wallingford
24. Scorza, R. and W.R. Okie. 1991. Peaches (Prunus). Acta Hort. 290:175-231.
25. Werner, D.J., D.F. Ritchie, D.W. Cain, and E.I. Zehr. 1986. Susceptibility of peaches and nectarines, plant introductions, and other Prunus species to bacterial spot. HortScience 21:127-130.