Towards experimental fluid dynamos

Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

Volumn 117, Issue 1-4, 2000, Pages 171-177

  Tilgner, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamo effect; Geophysics; Magnetic field

Indexed keywords

GEODYNAMO; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD;

EID: 0033965478     PISSN: 00319201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9201(99)00095-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Ampère, 1998. In: Alemany, A., Daviaud, F., Léorat, J. (Eds.), Presentations given at the International Workshop on Laboratory Experiments on Dynamo Action, Jurmala, Latvia. June 14-16.
2. Bevir M.K. Possibility of electromagnetic self-excitation in liquid metal flows in fast reactors. J. Br. Nucl. Energy Soc. 12:1973;455-458.
3. Busse, F.H., 1992. Dynamo theory of planetary magnetism and laboratory experiments. In: Friedrich, R., Wunderlin, A. (Eds.), Evolution of Dynamical Structures in Complex Systems, Springer, Berlin, pp. 197-208.
4. Busse F.H., Müller U., Stieglitz R., Tilgner A. A two-scale homogeneous dynamo: an extended analytical model and an experimental demonstration under development. Magnetohydrodynamics. 32:1996;235-248.
5. Busse, F.H., Müller, U., Stieglitz, R., Tilgner, A., 1998. Spontaneous generation of magnetic fields in the laboratory. In: Busse, F.H., Müller, S.C. (Eds.), Evolution of Spontaneous Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems. Springer.
6. Cioni S., Ciliberto S., Sommeria J. Strongly turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in mercury: comparison with results at moderate Prandtl number. J. Fluid Mech. 335:1997;111-140.
7. Dudley M.L., James R.W. Time dependent kinematic dynamos with stationary flows. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 245:1989;407-429.
8. Forest, C., 1998. Madison Dynamo Experiment. http://aida.physics.wisc.edu/.
9. Gailitis, A., 1990. The helical MHD dynamo. In: Moffatt, H.K., Tsinober, A. (Eds.), Topological Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 147-156.
10. Gailitis, A., 1993. Experimental aspects of a laboratory scale liquid sodium dynamo model. In: Proctor, M.R.E., Matthews, P.C., Rucklidge, A.M. (Eds.), Theory of Solar and Planetary Dynamos. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 91-98.
11. Gailitis A. Current status of liquid sodium MHD dynamo experiment in Riga. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Transfer Phenomena in Magnetohydrodynamic and Electroconducting Flows, Aussois, France. 1:1997;33-38.
12. Gailitis A., Freiberg Ya. Theory of a helical MHD dynamo. Magnetohydrodynamics. 12:1977;127-130.
13. Gailitis A.K., Karasev B.G., Kirillov I.R., Lielausis O.A., Luzhanskii S.M., Ogorodnikov A.P., Presltskii G.V. Liquid metal MHD dynamo model experiment. Magn. Girodin. 4:1987;3-7.
14. Gans R.F. On hydromagnetic precession in cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 45:1970;111-130.
15. Herzenberg A. Geomagnetic dynamos. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 250:1958;543-585.
16. Ji, H., 1998. Presentation given at the International Workshop on Laboratory Experiments on Dynamo Action, Jurmala, Latvia, June 14-16.
17. Lathrop, D., 1998. http://www-chaos.umd.edu/.
18. Lehnert B. An experiment on axisymmetric flow of liquid sodium in a magnetic field. Ark. Fys. 13:1958;109-116.
19. Lielausis O. Dynamo theory and liquid metal mhd experiments. Astron. Nachr. 315:1994;303-317.
20. Lowes F.J., Wilkinson I. Geomagnetic dynamo: a laboratory model. Nature. 198:1963;1158-1160.
21. Lowes F.J., Wilkinson I. Geomagnetic dynamo: an improved laboratory model. Nature. 219:1968;717-718.
22. Malkus, W.V.R., 1967. See Ref. 26 in Roberts and Jensen (1993).
23. Pierson E.S. Electromagnetic self-excitation in the liquid metal fast breeder reactor. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 57:1975;155-163.
24. Plunian F., Alemany A., Marty Ph. Influence of MHD parameters on electromagnetic self-excitation in the core of a fast breeder. Magnetohydrodynamics. 31:1995;382-390.
25. Ponomarenko Yu.B. Theory of the hydromagnetic generator. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 14:1973;775-778.
26. Rädler K.-H., Apstein E., Rheinhardt M., Schüler M. The Karlsruhe dynamo experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 42:1998;224-231.
27. Roberts G.O. Dynamo action of fluid motions with two-dimensional periodicity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 271:1972;411-454.
28. Roberts P.H., Jensen T.H. Homogeneous dynamos: theory and practice. Phys. Fluids B. 5:1993;2657-2662.
29. Stefani F., Gerbeth G., Gailitis A. Velocity profile optimization for the Riga dynamo experiment. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Transfer Phenomena in Magnetohydrodynamic and Electroconducting Flows, Aussois, France. 1:1998;27-32.
30. Steenbeck M., Kirko I.M., Gailitis A., Klawina A.P., Krause F., Laumanis I.J., Lielausis O.A. Mber. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. 9:1967;714-719.
31. Takeshita T., Segawa T., Glazier J.A., Sano M. Thermal turbulence in mercury. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:1996;1465-1468.
32. Tilgner A. A kinematic dynamo with a small scale velocity field. Phys. Lett. A. 226:1997;75-79.
33. Tilgner A. Predictions on the behaviour of the Karlsruhe dynamo. Acta Astron. Geophys. Univ. Comenianae. 19:1997;51-62.
34. Wilkinson I. The contribution of laboratory dynamo experiments to our understanding of the mechanism of generation of planetary magnetic fields. Geophysical Surveys. 7:1984;107-122.