Diurnal regulation of photosynthesis in understory saplings

New Phytologist

Volumn 145, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-49

  Singsaas, Eric L ^a   Ort, Donald R ^a,b   DeLucia, Evan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acer rubrum; Cercis canadensis; Diurnal variation; Elevated CO2; FACE; Liquidambar styraciflua; Photosynthesis; Understory

Indexed keywords

DIURNAL VARIATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SAPLING; UNDERSTORY;

EID: 0033960865     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00556.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barton AM, Gleeson SK. 1996. Ecophysiology of seedlings of oaks and red maple across a topographic gradient in eastern Kentucky. Forest Science 43: 335-342.
2. Basu PS, Sharma A, Sukumaran NP. 1998. Changes in net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in potato leaves induced by water stress. Photosynthetica 35: 13-19.
3. Büssis D, Heineke D, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L, Raschke K, Heldt HW. 1997. Solute accumulation and decreased photosynthesis in leaves of potato plants expressing yeast-derived invertase either in the apoplast, vacuole, or cytosol. Planta 202: 126-136.
4. Correia MJ, Chaves MMC, Pereira JS. 1990. Afternoon depression in photosynthesis in grapevine leaves-evidence for a high light stress effect. Journal of Experimental Botany 41: 417-426.
5. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313.
6. 2 evolution ot leaves of higher plants. Planta 171: 171-184.
7. 2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609-639.
8. 3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
9. 3 plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 45: 235-256.
10. Goldschmidt EE, Huber SC. 1992. Regulation of photosynthesis by end-product accumulation in leaves of plants storing starch, sucrose, and hexose sugars. Plant Physiology 99: 1443-1448.
11. Greer DH. 1998. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in dwarf bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaves: effect of sink-limitations induced by changes in daily photon receipt. Planta 205: 189-196.
12. Harley PC, Baldocchi DD. 1995. Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. 1. Leaf model parametnzation. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 1146-1156.
13. 3 leaves to environmental factors. In: Boote KJ, Loomis RS, eds. Modeling crop photosynthesis - from biochemistry to canopy. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America, 17-39.
14. 2. Global Change Biology 5: 293-309.
15. Hendrey G, Kimball B. 1994. The FACE program. Agricultural and Forest Meterology 70: 3-14.
16. Krall JP, Sheveleva EV, Pearcy RW. 1995. Regulation of photosynthetic induction state in high-and low-light-grown soybean and Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don. Plant Physiology 109: 307-317.
17. Lei TT, Lechowicz MJ. 1997. The photosynthetic response of eight species of Acer to simulated light regimes from the centre and edges of gaps. Functional Ecology 11: 16-23.
18. Lewin K, Hendrey G, Nagy J, LaMorte R. 1994. Design and application of a free-air carbon dioxide enrichment facility. Agricultural and Forest Meterology 70: 15-29.
19. 3 vascular plants of contrasting habits and taxonomic groupings. Planta 189: 226-234.
20. 2. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 593-603.
21. 2 on the relationship between photosynthetic capacity and N content in rice leaves. Plant Physiology 115: 191-198.
22. Ögren E, Sjostrom M. 1990. Estimation of the effect of photoinhibtion on the carbon gain in leaves of a willow canopy. Planta 181: 560-567.
23. 2 concentration increase photosynthesis in forest floor vegetation? Plant Physiology 114: 337-344.
24. Pammenter NW, Loreto F, Sharkey TD. 1993. End product feedback effects on photosynthetic electron transport. Photosynthesis Research 35: 5-14.
25. Pathre U, Sinha AK, Shirke PK, Sane PV. 1998. Factors determining the midday depression of photosynthesis in trees under monsoon climate. Trees - Structure and Function 12: 472-481.
26. Pearcy RW, Yang W. 1998. The functional morphology of light capture and carbon gain in the redwood forest understorey plant Adenocaulon bicolor Hook. Functional Ecology 12: 543-552.
27. Potvin C, Lechowicz M. 1990. The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71: 1389-1400.
28. 2 assimilation in leaves of Arbutus unedo L.: diurnal changes in photosynthetic capacity related to changes in temperature and humidity. Planta 168: 546-558.
29. 2concentration in young birch (Betula pendula) trees. Tree Physiology 18: 441-450.
30. Sassenrath Cole GF, Pearcy RW. 1994. Regulation of photosynthetic induction state by the magnitude and duration of low light exposure. Plant Physiology 105: 1115-1123.
31. Sharkey TD. 1984. Transpiration-induced changes in the photosynthetic capacity of leaves. Planta 160: 143-150.
32. Sims DA, Pearcy RW. 1993. SunHeck frequency and duration affects growth rate of the understory plant, Alocasia macrorrhiza. Functional Ecology 7: 683-689.
33. Sinha AK, Shirke PA, Pathre U, Sane PV. 1997. Midday depression in photosynthesis: effect on sucrose-phosphate synthase and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in leaves of Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. Photosynthetica 34: 115-124.
34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles an practice of statistics in biological research. New York, USA: W. H. Freeman & Co.
35. 2 exchange of leaves of Quercus suber. Planta 162: 193-203.
36. 2. Plant Physiology 118: 945-955.
37. Tissue D, Wright S. 1995. Effect of seasonal water availability on phenology and the annual shoot carbohydrate cycle of tropical forest shrubs. Functional Ecology 9: 518-527.
38. 2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 631-640.
39. Valladares F, Allen MT, Pearcy RW. 1997. Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occurring along a light gradient. Oecologia 111: 505-514.
40. 2 through feedback regulation of gene expression: climate of opinion. Photosynthesis Research 48: 353-365.
41. 2. Plant, Cell and Environment 17: 913-923.
42. Watling JR, Robinson SA, Woodrow IE, Osmond CB. 1997. Responses of rainforest understorey plants to excess light during sunflecks. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24: 17-25.
43. Wise RR, Sparrow DH, Ortiz-Lopez A, Ort DR. 1991. Biochemical regulation during the mid-day decline of photosynthesis in field-grown sunflower. Plant Science 74: 45-52.
44. 2 enrichment at the top of a tropical forest. Oecologia 116: 18-25.
45. Yong JWH, Wong SC, Farquhar GD. 1997. Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure difference between leaf and air. Plant, Cell and Environment 20: 1213-1216.