The usefulness of cystoscopy in the staging of cervical cancer

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 200-203

  Liang, Ching Chung ^a   Tseng, Chih Jen ^a   Soong, Yung Kuei ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; CT scan; Cystoscopy; Ureteric catheterization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CYSTOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URETER CATHETER; URETER OBSTRUCTION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0033959649     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5679     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pecorelli S, Benedet J L, Creasman W T, Shepherd J H. FIGO staging of gyncecologic cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 64:1999;5-10.
2. Van Nagell J R Jr, Roddick J W Jr, Lowin D M. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinic staging and pathologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 110:1971;973-978.
3. Averette H E, Dudan R C, Ford J H Jr. Exploratory celiotomy for surgical staging of cervical caner. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 113:1972;1090-1096.
4. Averette H E, Ford J H Jr, Dudan R C, Girtanner R E, Hoskins W J, Lutz M H. Staging of cervical cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 18:1975;215-232.
5. Chen S S, Kumari S, Lee L. Contribution of abdominal computed tomography in the management of gynecologic cancer: correlated study of CT image and gross surgical pathology. Gynecol Oncol. 10:1980;162-172.
6. Mamatora H, Isherwood I. Computed tomography in ovarian carcinoma: patterns of disease and limitations. Clin Radiol. 33:1982;165-171.
7. King L A, Talledo O E, Gallup D G, EI Gammal TAM. Computed tomography in evaluation of gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 155:1986;960-964.
8. Walsh J W, Goplerud D R. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 137:1981;997-1003.
9. Brenner D E, Whitley N O, Prempree T, Villasanta U. An evaluation of the computed tomographic scanner for the staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 50:1982;2323-2328.
10. Kilcheski T S, Arger P H, Mulhern C B Jr, Coleman B G, Kressel H Y, Mikuta J I. Role of computed tomography in the presurgical evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 5:1981;378-383.
11. Berek J S, Adashi E Y, Hillard P A. Cervical and vaginal cancer. Novak's Textbook of Gynecology. 1996;Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. p. 1111-1140.
12. Hillman B J, Clark R L, Babbitt G. Efficacy of the excretory urogram in the staging of gynecologic malignancies. Am J Roentgenol. 143:1984;997-999.
13. Lindell L K, Anderson B. Routine pretreatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 69:1987;242-246.
14. Goldman S M, Fishman E K, Rosenshein N B, Gatewood O M, Siegelman S S. Excretory urography and computed tomography in the initial evaluation of patients with cervical cancer: are both examinations necessary. Am J Roentgenol. 143:1984;991-996.
15. Kikinis R, Von schulthess GK, Jager P. Normal and hydronephrotic kidney: evaluation of renal function with contrast enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 165:1987;837-842.
16. Semelka R C, Hricak H, Tomei E, Floth A, Stoller M. Obstructive nephropathy: evaluation with dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 175:1990;799-803.
17. Montana G S, Hanlon A L, Brickner T J, Thomas G M, Lanciano R. Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies: review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 survey. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 32:1995;1481-1486.
18. Hricak H, Yu K K, Powell C B, Subak L L, Stern J L, Arenson R L. Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix. Acad Radiol. 3:1996;S44-S46.
19. Hricak H, Powell C B, Yu K K, Washington E, Subak L L, Stern J L, Cisternas M G, Arenson R L. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. Radiology. 198:1996;403-409.
20. Russell A H, Shingleton H M, Jones W B, Fremgen A, Winchester D P, Clive R, Chmiel J S. Diagnostic assessment in patients with invasive cancer of the cervix: a national patterns of care study of the American college of surgeons. Gynecol Oncol. 63:1996;159-165.
21. Pryor J L, Langley M J, Jenkins A D. Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol. 145:1991;719-722.
22. Sundborg M J, Taylor R R, Mark J, Elg S A. Cystoscopy after computed tomography scan to identify bladder invasion in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 92:1998;364-366.
23. Van Nagell J R Jr, Spraque A D, Roddick J W Jr. The effect of intravenous pyelography and cystoscopy on the staging of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 3:1975;87-91.
24. Wood E C, Maher P, Pelosi M A. Routine use of ureteric catheters at laparoscopic hysterectomy may cause unnecessary complications. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 3:1996;393-397.
25. Sheikh F A, Khubchandani I T. Prophylactic ureteric catheters in colon surgery - how safe are they. Dis Col Rect. 33:1990;508-510.