-
1
-
-
0342300440
-
-
The Cochrane Library; Issue 1. Vista, CA: Update Software
-
The Cochrane Methods Handbook. The Cochrane Library; Issue 1. Vista, CA: Update Software; 1999.
-
(1999)
The Cochrane Methods Handbook
-
-
-
2
-
-
84970861456
-
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
-
Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286-91.
-
(1994)
BMJ
, vol.309
, pp. 1286-1291
-
-
Dickersin, K.1
Scherer, R.2
Lefebvre, C.3
-
3
-
-
0030023459
-
Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: Implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews
-
Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 1996; 347:363-6.
-
(1996)
Lancet
, vol.347
, pp. 363-366
-
-
Moher, D.1
Fortin, P.2
Jadad, A.R.3
-
4
-
-
0343471474
-
Language bias in randomised controlled trials in English and German
-
Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials in English and German. Lancet 1997;350:326-9.
-
(1997)
Lancet
, vol.350
, pp. 326-329
-
-
Egger, M.1
Zellweger-Zahner, T.2
Schneider, M.3
Junker, C.4
Antes, G.5
-
5
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408-12.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Hayes, R.J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
6
-
-
0032558314
-
Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
-
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352:609-13.
-
(1998)
Lancet
, vol.352
, pp. 609-613
-
-
Moher, D.1
Pham, B.2
Jones, A.3
-
9
-
-
0029645346
-
Invited commentary: Benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies
-
Berlin JA. Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:383-7.
-
(1995)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.142
, pp. 383-387
-
-
Berlin, J.A.1
-
10
-
-
0029089575
-
Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies: A commentary
-
Colditz GA, Burdick E, Mosteller F. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies: a commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:371-82.
-
(1995)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.142
, pp. 371-382
-
-
Colditz, G.A.1
Burdick, E.2
Mosteller, F.3
-
11
-
-
0028764074
-
Advantages and limitations of metaanalytic regressions of clinical trials data
-
4 June: Doc. No. 124
-
Berlin JA, Antman EM. Advantages and limitations of metaanalytic regressions of clinical trials data. Online J Curr Clin Trials; 4 June 1994: Doc. No. 124.
-
(1994)
Online J Curr Clin Trials
-
-
Berlin, J.A.1
Antman, E.M.2
|