Visual input regulates circuit configuration in courtship conditioning of Drosophila melanogaster

Learning and Memory

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 32-42

  Joiner, Mei Ling A ^a,b   Griffith, Leslie C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE (CALCIUM,CALMODULIN) II;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMOREACTIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BRAIN; CA(2+)-CALMODULIN DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENES, REPORTER; LIGHT; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PEPTIDES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033953755     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.7.1.32     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ackerman, S.L. and R.W. Siegel. 1986. Chemically reinforced conditioned courtship in Drosophila: Responses to wild-type and the dunce, amnesiac and don giovanni mutants. J. Neurogenet. 3: 111-123.
2. Barth, M. and M. Heisenberg. 1997. Vision affects mushroom bodies and central complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Learn. & Mem. 4: 219-229.
3. Brand, A.M. and E.L. Dormand. 1995. The GAL4 system as a tool for unraveling the mysteries of the Drosophila nervous system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5: 572-578.
4. Brand, A.H. and N. Perrimon. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
5. Chatterjee, S. and B.N. Singh. 1988. Effect of light and dark on mating behavior of red eye and white eye Drosophila ananassae. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 26: 611-614.
6. Connolly, K., B. Burnet, and D. Sewell. 1969. Selective mating and visual pigmentation: An analysis of the visual component in the courtship behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 23: 548-559.
7. DeJianne, D., A. Pruzan-Hotchkiss, and J. Grossfeld. 1981. Light dependent mating inhibilion in the white-eyed mutant of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Experientia 37: 465-466.
8. Douglass, J.K. and N.J. Strausfeld. 1998. Functionally and anatomically segregated visual pathways in the lobula complex of a calliphorid fly. J. Comp. Neurol. 396: 84-104.
9. Ferveur, J.-F. 1997. The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 19: 353-358.
10. Gailey, D.A., F.R. Jackson, and R.W. Siegel. 1984. Conditioning mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect an experience-dependent behavioral modification in courting males. Genetics 106: 613-623.
11. Gailey, D.A., T.C. Lacaillade, and J.C. Hall. 1986. Chemosensory elements of courtship in normal and mutant, olfaction-deficient Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 16: 375-405.
12. Gailey, D.A. and R.W. Siegel. 1989. A mutant strain in Drosophila melanogaster that is defective in courtship behavioral cues. Anim. Behav. 38: 163-169.
13. Geer, B.W. and M.M. Green. 1962. Genotype, phenotype and mating behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 96: 175-181.
14. Gilbert, C. and N.J. Strausfeld. 1991. The functional organization of male-specific visual neurons in flies. J. Comp. Physiol. 169: 395-411.
15. Griffith, L.C., L.M. Verselis, K.M. Aitken, C.P. Kyriacou, and R.J. Greenspan. 1993. Inhibition of calcium/ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in Drosophila disrupts behavioral plasticity. Neuron 10: 501-509.
16. Griffith, L.C., J. Wang, Y. Zhong, C.F. Wu, and R.J. Greenspan. 1994. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and potassium channel subunit Eag similarly affect plasticity in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 10044-10048.
17. Grossfield, J. 1966. The influence of light on the mating behavior of Drosophila. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6615: 147-176.
18. Joiner, M.A. and L.C. Griffith. 1997. CaM kinase II and visual input modulate memory formation in the neuronal circuit controlling courtship conditioning. J. Neurosci. 17: 9384-9391.
19. _. 1999. Mapping of the anatomical circuit of CaM kinase-dependent courtship conditioning in Drosophila. Learn. & Mem. 6: 177-192.
20. Kamyshev, N.G., K.G. Iliadi, and J.V. Bragina. 1999. Drosophila conditioned courtship: Two ways of testing memory. Learn. & Mem. 6: 1-20.
21. Kane, N.S., A. Robichon, J.A. Dickinson, and R.J. Greenspan. 1997. Learning without performance in PKC-deficient Drosophila. Neuron 18: 307-314.
22. Koh, Y.H., E. Popova, U. Thomas, L.C. Griffith, and V. Budnik. 1999. Regulation of DLG localization at synapses by CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation. Cell 98: 353-363.
23. Li, Y. and N.J. Strausfeld. 1999. Multimodal efferent and recurrent neurons in the medial lobes of cockroach mushroom bodies. J. Comp. Neurol. 409: 647-663.
24. Lindsley, D.L. and G.G. Zimm. 1992. The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
25. Markow, T.A. 1987. Behavioral and sensory basis of courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84: 6200-6204.
26. Rauschecker, J.P. 1995. Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci 18: 36-43.
27. Siegel, R.W. and J.C. Hall. 1979. Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76: 565-578.
28. Sokol, R.R. and H.R. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY.
29. Stocker, R.F. and N. Gendre. 1989. Courtship behavior of Drosophila genetically or surgically deprived of basiconic sensilla. Behav. Genet. 19: 371-385.
30. Stocker, R.F., M.C. Lienhard, A. Borst, and K.F. Fischbach. 1990. Neuronal architecture of the antennal lobe in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 262: 9-34.
31. Stocker, R.F., G. Heimbeck, N. Gendre, and J.S. de Belle. 1997. Neuroblast ablation in Drosophila P[GAL4] lines reveals origins of olfactory interneurons. J. Neurobiol. 32: 443-456.
32. Strausfeld, N. J. 1976. Mosaic organizations, layers, and visual pathways in the insect brain. In Neural principles in vision (ed. F. Zettler and R. Weiler), pp. 245-279. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
33. Tompkins, L. 1984. Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 14: 411-440.
34. Tompkins, L. and J.C. Hall. 1981. The different effects on courtship of volatile compounds from mated and virgin Drosophila females. J. Insect Physiol. 27: 17-21.
35. Tompkins, L., J.C. Hall, and L.M. Hall. 1980. Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 26: 689-697.
36. Tompkins, L., A.C. Gross, J.C. Hall, D.A. Gailey, and R.W. Siegel. 1982. The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 12: 295-307.
37. Tompkins, L., R.W. Siegel, D.A. Gailey, and J.C. Hall. 1983. Conditioned courtship in Drosophila and its mediation by chemical cues. Genetics 13: 565-578.
38. Wolf, R., T. Wittig, L. Liu, G. Wustmann, D. Eyding, and M. Heisenberg. 1998. Drosophila mushroom bodies are dispensable for visual, tactile, and motor learning. Learn. & Mem. 5: 166-178.
39. Yin, J.C.P., J.S. Wallach, M. DelVecchio, E.L. Wilde, H. Zhou, W.G. Quinn, and T. Tully. 1994. Induction of a dominant-negative CREB transgene specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell 79: 49-58.