Decision support in nuclear emergencies

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 71, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 321-342

  Papamichail, K N ^a   French, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constraint satisfaction techniques; Explanation; Multi attribute value function; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY; EXPERT SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; PROTECTION; RADIOACTIVITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENTS, RADIATION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; DISASTER PLANNING; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; POWER PLANTS; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; WEATHER;

EID: 0033953229     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00086-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ehrhardt J., Brown J., French S., Kelly G.N., Mikkelsen T., Müller H. RODOS: decision-making support for off-site emergency management after nuclear accidents. Kerntechnik. 62:1997;122-128.
2. S. French, K.N. Papamichail, D.C. Ranyard, J.Q. Smith,Design of a decision support system for use in the event of a nuclear emergency, in: F. Javier Giron, M. Lina Martinez (Eds.), Applied Decision Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 2-18, 1998.
3. S. French, J. Ehrhardt, J. Lochard, M. Morrey, K. Sinkko, A. Sohier, What sort of support is needed in nuclear emergency management? 5th International Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, Athens, Greece, 1999, pp. 443-447.
4. R.P. Hämäläinen, K. Sinkko, M. Lindstedt, M. Amman, A. Salo, RODOS and Decision Conferencing on Early Phase Protective Actions in Finland, Research Report STUK-159, STUK Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland, 1998.
5. Papamichail K.N., French S. Generating feasible strategies in nuclear emergencies - a constraint satisfaction problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 50(6):1999;617.
6. K.N. Papamichail, Explaining and justifying decision support advice in intuitive terms, Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Brighton, 1998, pp. 102-103.
7. Teach R.L., Shortliffe E.H. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput. Biomed. Res. 14:1981;542-558.
8. ICRP Principles for intervention for protection of the public in a radiological emergency. Ann. ICRP. 22:1993;4. ICRP Publication 63.
9. Morrey M., Haywood S., Brown J., Higgins N., Fry F. Intervention for recovery after accidents. Documents of the NRPB. 8(1):1997;3-20.
10. ICRP Protection of the public in the event of major radiation accidents: principles for practice. Ann. ICRP. 14(2):1984;. ICRP Publication 40.
11. J. Ehrhardt, I. Hasemann, C. Matzerath-Boccaccini, C. Steinhauer, J. Raicevic, COSYMA: Health Effects Models, FZK Report 5567, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 1995.
12. Päsler-Sauer J., Schichtel T. The simulation of early emergency actions in RODOS. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 73(1-4):1997;71-74.
13. Brown J., Smith K.R., Mansfield P., Smith J. Models for decontamination, relocation and agricultural countermeasures. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 73(1-4):1997;75-79.
14. R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.
15. R.T. Clemen, Making hard decisions - an introduction to decision analysis, PWS-Kent, Duxbury Series, Boston, 1991.
16. NRPB, Living with Radiation, National Radiological Protection Board, HMSO Publication Centre, London, 1989.
17. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 211:1981;453-458.
18. K.N., Papamichail, The Design of an Evaluation Module within RODOS and its Assessment, 5th International Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, Athens, Greece, 1999.
19. A.G.M. Schenker-Wicki, The Conceptual Definition of a Crisis Management Decision Support System CMDSS for Evaluating Acceptable Countermeasures to Reduce Ingestion Dose after an Accidental Release of Radioactivity, University Press Fribourg Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland, 1990.
20. D. Soulatges, A. Despres, A. Diaz, DACFOOD: a decision support system in case of foodstuffs contamination, Presented at the Joint International Conference on Operational Research and Management Science, Helsinki, Finlad, 1992.
21. A. Goloubenkov, D. Kamajev, J. Ustinov, Formation of the utility function taking into account uncertainties in expert preferences, RODOS Report RODOS(WG5)-TN(98)04, Federal Environment Emergency Research Centre Scientific Production Association "Typhoon", 1998.
22. V. Borzenko, S. French, Decision analytic methods in RODOS, in: A. Karaoglou, G. Desmet, G.N. Kelly, H.G. Menzel (Eds.), The Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident, EUR 166544 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996, pp. 1149-1158.
23. A. Appelgren, U. Bergström, J. Brittain, E. Gallego Díaz, L. Håkanson, R. Heling, L. Monte, An outline of a model-based expert system to identify optimal remedial strategies for restoring contaminated aquatic ecosystems: the project "MOIRA", Technical Report RT/AMB/96/17, Dipartimento Ambiente, Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e l'Ambiente, 1996.
24. Papazoglou I.A., Christou M.D. A decision support system for emergency response to major nuclear accidents. Nucl. Technol. 118:1997;97-122.
25. Papazoglou I.A., Kollas J.G. Establishing protective long term measures after severe nuclear accidents using multiple criteria. Health Phys. 72(5):1997;676-692.
26. Perny P., Vanderpooten D. An interactive multiobjective procedure for selecting medium-term countermeasures after nuclear accidents. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 7:1998;48-60.
27. Yatsalo B., Mitzeabassov O., Okrimenko I., Pichugina I., Kulagin B. PRANA - decision support system for assessment of countermeasure strategy in the long-term period of liquidation of the consequences of a nuclear accident (agrosphere). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 73(1-4):1997;291-294.
28. Wagenaar et al., RADE-AID: an operational tool for decision makers, Proceedings of the Seminar on Methods and Codes for Assessing the Off-Site Consequences of Nuclear Accidents, Athens, Greece, 1990, pp. 577-612.
29. Weerakkody S.D., Witzig W.F. A rational model for the off-site protective action selection during nuclear reactor accidents. Nucl. Technol. 78(1):1987;43-53.
30. ICRP Optimisation and decision-making in radiological protection. Ann. ICRP. 20(1):1989;. ICRP Publication 55.